State regulation and response inhibition in children with ADHD and children with early‐ and continuously treated phenylketonuria: An event‐related potential comparison
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presentation rate of stimuli plays an important role in explaining the performance inefficiency in children with ADHD. In general, children with ADHD have been found to perform more poorly in conditions of relatively slow event rates as compared with fast and moderate event rates. The state regulation hypothesis states that these children have problems in correcting their energetic state necessary to counteract a performance decrement, which requires extra effort allocation. In this study, we investigated state regulation in children with ADHD and used children with early- and continuously treated phenylketonuria (PKU) as a clinical contrast group. METHOD: We measured the parietal P3 during a Go/No-Go task that incorporated a condition with a fast and a slow presentation rate. RESULTS: We were able to show that children with ADHD, relative to controls, responded more slowly and more variably in the slow condition only, which was accompanied by a smaller P3, suggesting less effort allocation. In contrast, the children with PKU did not show a state regulation deficit. The PKU group showed prolonged stimulus evaluation processing, as indexed by P3 latency, compared to controls and children with ADHD. In addition, they made more errors of commission than the controls and the ADHD group. CONCLUSIONS: Our electrophysiological data support the state regulation hypothesis of ADHD. Only the children with PKU had more problems in inhibiting pre-potent responding than controls, which is in accord with the prefrontal dysfunction hypothesis of PKU.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ERP studies showed that slow and inaccurate RT performance in the condition with a long ISI was accompanied by reduced parietal P3 amplitude indicating less effort allocation.
“These studies showed that slow and inaccurate RT performance in the condition with a long ISI was accompanied by reduced parietal P3 amplitude indicating less effort allocation”
From Context-dependent Dynamic Processes in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Differentiating Common and Unique Effects of State Regulation Deficits and Delay Aversion (2010) · cites this paper as Wiersema et al., 2005
Cites
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Information Processing and Energetic Factors in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Sergeant, J. A., Oosterlaan, J., & van der Meere, J. (1999) · Handbook of Disruptive Behavior Disorders · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4881-2_4 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reaction time variability in ADHD: A meta-analytic review of 319 studies
Kofler, M. J., Rapport, M. D., Sarver, D. E., Raiker, J. S., Orban, S. A., Friedman, L. M., & Kolomeyer, E. G. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.001 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Carrion, V. G., Garrett, A., Menon, V., Weems, C. F., & Reiss, A. L. (2008) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20346 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H. (2010) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9115-0 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Department of Experimental‐Clinical and Health Psychology Ghent University Henri Dunantlaan 2 Ghent B‐9000 Belgium
- Corresponding author
- Wiersema, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 831-843
- ISSN
- 0141-8955 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2665
- OpenAlex
- W2166302572
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit Gent
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, phenylketonuria, response inhibition, P300, presentation rate, effort allocation, go/no-go task, commission errors, prefrontal cortex dysfunction, children
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Phenylketonurias, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review