Cited by 37Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

State regulation and response inhibition in children with ADHD and children with early‐ and continuously treated phenylketonuria: An event‐related potential comparison

Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., Roeyers, H.·2005·Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presentation rate of stimuli plays an important role in explaining the performance inefficiency in children with ADHD. In general, children with ADHD have been found to perform more poorly in conditions of relatively slow event rates as compared with fast and moderate event rates. The state regulation hypothesis states that these children have problems in correcting their energetic state necessary to counteract a performance decrement, which requires extra effort allocation. In this study, we investigated state regulation in children with ADHD and used children with early- and continuously treated phenylketonuria (PKU) as a clinical contrast group. METHOD: We measured the parietal P3 during a Go/No-Go task that incorporated a condition with a fast and a slow presentation rate. RESULTS: We were able to show that children with ADHD, relative to controls, responded more slowly and more variably in the slow condition only, which was accompanied by a smaller P3, suggesting less effort allocation. In contrast, the children with PKU did not show a state regulation deficit. The PKU group showed prolonged stimulus evaluation processing, as indexed by P3 latency, compared to controls and children with ADHD. In addition, they made more errors of commission than the controls and the ADHD group. CONCLUSIONS: Our electrophysiological data support the state regulation hypothesis of ADHD. Only the children with PKU had more problems in inhibiting pre-potent responding than controls, which is in accord with the prefrontal dysfunction hypothesis of PKU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10545-005-0110-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Department of Experimental‐Clinical and Health Psychology Ghent University Henri Dunantlaan 2 Ghent B‐9000 Belgium
Corresponding author
Wiersema, J. R.
Venue
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
831-843
ISSN
  • 0141-8955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2665
OpenAlex
W2166302572
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiteit Gent
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, phenylketonuria, response inhibition, P300, presentation rate, effort allocation, go/no-go task, commission errors, prefrontal cortex dysfunction, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Phenylketonurias, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review