The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neonatal screening in Europe; the situation in 2004
Abstract
Summary: This report outlines the status of neonatal screening in Europe in 2004. Out of the 45 member states of the Council of Europe plus the regions Scotland and Wales (in total 47 ‘countries’), no data at all were available from 3 (Albania, Azerbaijan and Georgia). From the other 44, varying amounts of data were received. Apart from Armenia, Finland and Malta, all countries have a national programme for phenylketonuria (PKU), although in some countries those programmes do not yet have 100% coverage. Moldova and Ukraine have no national programme for congenital hypothyroidism (CH), the other countries do. Twelve countries screen for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), 6 for cystic fibrosis (CF) and 7 for galactosaemia (GAL), 6 for biotinidase deficiency (BD) and 4 for medium‐chain acyl‐CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD). Some countries have pilot programmes for certain conditions or different programmes per screening laboratory. The prevalences for PKU vary from 1:3000 to 1:30 000, and for CH from 1:1300 to 1:13 000. Methodologies vary within and between countries. There appears to be no relationship between the cut‐off limits and the recall rate. A first priority is to help those countries where the basic screening programmes have less than 100% coverage. In addition, continuous monitoring of the European programmes will help to decrease the variation in design and methodology by making use of the knowledge and expertise available from the global membership of the International Society for Neonatal Screening (ISNS). The huge difference of recall rates illustrate one obvious and important area for improvement of programme performances that could be aided by strengthened European cooperation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system—executive summary
Watson, M. S., Mann, M. Y., Lloyd-Puryear, M. A., Rinaldo, P., Howell, R. R., & American College of Medical Genetics Newborn Screening Expert Group (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2633i · Cited by 494
Cited by
The complete European guidelines on phenylketonuria: diagnosis and treatment
van Wegberg, A. M. J., MacDonald, A., Ahring, K., Bélanger-Quintana, A., Blau, N., Bosch, A. M., Burlina, A., Campistol, J., Feillet, F., Giżewska, M., et al. (2017) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0685-2 · Cited by 830
Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015
Therrell, B. L., Padilla, C. D., Loeber, J. G., Kneisser, I., Saadallah, A., Borrajo, G. J. C., & Adams, J. (2015) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2015.03.002 · Cited by 602
Self-citationKey European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with phenylketonuria
van Spronsen, F. J., van Wegberg, A. M., Ahring, K., Bélanger-Quintana, A., Blau, N., Bosch, A. M., Burlina, A., Campistol, J., Feillet, F., Giżewska, M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30320-5 · Cited by 425
Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: A worldwide view of strategies
Ford, G., & LaFranchi, S. H. (2014) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.008 · Cited by 274
Corbetta, C., Weber, G., Cortinovis, F., Calebiro, D., Passoni, A., Vigone, M. C., Beck‐Peccoz, P., Chiumello, G., & Persani, L. (2009) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03568.x · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Loeber, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 430-438
- ISSN
- 0141-8955 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2665
- OpenAlex
- W2093350983
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal screening in Europe; the situation in 2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10545-007-0644-5
- The paper
- Loeber, J. G. (2007). Neonatal screening in Europe; the situation in 2004. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-007-0644-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.