Cited by 34Lysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

Clinical aspects of neuropathic lysosomal storage disorders

Jardim, Laura Bannach, Villanueva, Maria Mercedes, de Souza, Carolina F. Moura, Netto, Cristina B. Oliveira·2010·Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to describe neurological phenotypes associated with lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), focusing on features arising from primary neuronal involvement. Clinical presentation, progression and genetic data, are discussed in detail in Part 2, the electronic material. Main features are summarized in Part 1. Insights gained from several observational studies are discussed. Prospective studies of the natural history of most neuronopathic LSDs have been hampered by the rarity of these conditions and the short survival of affected patients. Increasingly, longitudinal observations relating to neurological manifestations are being reported. Better clinical studies are necessary, including repeated measurements of disease progression to facilitate the development of sensitive scoring systems and appropriate counseling of affected individuals and their families. Ideally, clinical studies should involve a large cohort. As treatment becomes available, knowledge of disease expression and factors that influence the phenotype may enable critical assessment of therapeutic outcomes. It is hoped that increased familiarity with the clinical expression of individual LSDs will allow early diagnosis, so families at risk are given options to consider during future pregnancies. Early diagnosis also permits the introduction of timely intervention, to favoring improved outcome in cases that are potentially treatable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10545-010-9079-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Jardim, L. B., Villanueva, M. M., de Souza, C. F. M., & Netto, C. B. O.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Medical Genetics Service Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Corresponding author
Jardim, Laura Bannach
Venue
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-21
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
315-329
ISSN
  • 0141-8955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2665
OpenAlex
W2026068318
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Fundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
lysosomal storage disease, neurological phenotype, clinical features, disease progression, natural history (disease), genotype-phenotype correlation, early diagnosis, genetic counseling, treatment outcome assessment
MeSH terms
Genetic Counseling, Humans, Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review