Cited by 31Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Connectivity analysis and feature classification in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder sub-types: a task functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Park, Bo-yong, Kim, Mansu, Seo, Jongbum, Lee, Jong-min, Park, Hyunjin·2016·Brain Topography

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a pervasive neuropsychiatric disorder. Patients with different ADHD subtypes show different behaviors under different stimuli and thus might require differential approaches to treatment. This study explores connectivity differences between ADHD subtypes and attempts to classify these subtypes based on neuroimaging features. A total of 34 patients (13 ADHD-IA and 21 ADHD-C subtypes) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with six task paradigms. Connectivity differences between ADHD subtypes were assessed for the whole brain in each task paradigm. Connectivity measures of the identified regions were used as features for the support vector machine classifier to distinguish between ADHD subtypes. The effectiveness of connectivity measures of the regions were tested by predicting ADHD-related Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) scores. Significant connectivity differences between ADHD subtypes were identified mainly in the frontal, cingulate, and parietal cortices and partially in the temporal, occipital cortices and cerebellum. Classifier accuracy for distinguishing between ADHD subtypes was 91.18 % for both gambling punishment and emotion task paradigms. Linear prediction under the two task paradigms showed significant correlation with DSM hyperactive/impulsive score. Our study identified important brain regions from connectivity analysis based on an fMRI paradigm using gambling punishment and emotion task paradigms. The regions and associated connectivity measures could serve as features to distinguish between ADHD subtypes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10548-015-0463-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classifier accuracy for distinguishing between ADHD subtypes was 91.18% for gambling punishment and emotion task paradigms based on significant connectivity differences mainly in frontal, cingulate, and parietal cortices and partially in temporal, occipital cortices and cerebellum.

    “Classifier accuracy for distinguishing between ADHD subtypes was 91.18% for a gambling punishment and emotion task paradigms based on significant connectivity differences mainly in frontal, cingulate, and parietal cortices and partially in temporal, occipital cortices and cerebellum (Park et al., 2016).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 31

Authors
Park, B.-Y., Kim, M., Seo, J., Lee, J.-M., & Park, H.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Institute for Basic Science (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Hyunjin
Venue
Brain Topography
Published
2015-11-24
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
429-439
ISSN
  • 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6792
OpenAlex
W2173950059
Cited by
31
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R015-D1)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013R1A2A2A04016262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD subtypes, inattentive type ADHD, combined type ADHD, functional connectivity, support vector machine classification, frontal cortex, cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe, Support Vector Machine, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review