Cited by 63Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCancer survivorship and care

Non-initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Quality of Care study (BQUAL)

Open access
Neugut, Alfred I., Hillyer, Grace Clarke, Kushi, Lawrence H., Lamerato, Lois, Leoce, Nicole, Nathanson, S. David, Ambrosone, Christine B., Bovbjerg, Dana H. +5 more·2012·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Adjuvant hormonal therapy for non-metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer decreases risk of breast cancer recurrence and increases survival. However, some women do not initiate this life-saving treatment. We used a prospective cohort design to investigate factors related to non-initiation of hormonal therapy among women with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic HR-positive breast cancer recruited from three U.S. sites. Serial interviews were conducted at baseline and during treatment to examine sociodemographic factors, tumor characteristics, and treatment decision-making factors. Multivariate modeling assessed associations between variables of interest and hormonal therapy initiation. Of 1,050 breast cancer patients recruited, 725 (69%) had HR-positive breast cancer, of whom 87 (12.0%) based on self-report and 122 (16.8%) based on medical record/pharmacy fill rates did not initiate hormonal therapy. In a multivariable analysis, non-initiation of hormonal therapy, defined by medical record/pharmacy, was associated with having greater negative beliefs about efficacy of treatment (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.70). Non-initiation was less likely in those who found the quality of patient/physician communication to be higher (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), the hormonal therapy treatment decision an easy one to make (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.90) or neither easy nor difficult (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.58); and had more positive beliefs about hormonal therapy efficacy (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.34-0.62). Factors influencing non-initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy are complex and influenced by patient beliefs regarding treatment efficacy and side effects. Educational interventions to women about the benefits of hormonal therapy may decrease negative beliefs and increase hormone therapy initiation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-012-2066-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient variables, social support, patient-provider communication, and healthcare factors such as cost are associated with adherence to systemic therapies in breast cancer survivors.

    “Patient variables (e.g., age), social support, patient-provider communication, and healthcare factors (e.g., cost) have been associated with breast cancer survivor adherence to systemic therapies.6, 16-18”
  • Survivors who reported lack of understandable information, not being told about side effects in advance, limited opportunity to ask questions at diagnosis, and never being asked about difficulties taking adjuvant hormonal therapy had lower adherence rates.

    “There is also evidence that survivors who reported (1) lack of understandable information about treatment, (2) not being told about side effects in advance, (3) having limited opportunity to ask questions at the time of diagnosis, and (4) never having been asked about the difficulties of taking adjuvant hormonal therapy, exhibited lower rates of adherence to hormonal treatment.16-18”
  • Social support is associated with higher adherence in a meta-analysis with various medical conditions and in several adjuvant hormonal therapy studies with breast cancer survivors.

    “Social support has also been associated with higher adherence in a meta-analysis with various medical conditions46 and in several adjuvant hormonal therapy studies with breast cancer survivors.16, 17, 47”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Phillips KA Milne RL Buys S Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based Breast Cancer Family Registry J Clin Oncol 20 7 2005 23 21 4679 4686 15851764

Authors
Neugut, A. I., Hillyer, G. C., Kushi, L. H., Lamerato, L., Leoce, N., Nathanson, S. D., Ambrosone, C. B., Bovbjerg, D. H., Mandelblatt, J. S., Magai, C., Tsai, W.-Y., Jacobson, J. S., & Hershman, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • Long Island University (US)
  • Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Neugut, Alfred I.
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2012-04-22
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
419-428
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2028029314
Cited by
63
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r25ca094061-11)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (127617)
  • National Cancer Institute (R25-CA 094061, K05-CA96940, R43CA094601, U10CA84131, R25CA094601, R01CA105274, R01CA124924, U10CA084131, R01CA100598, K05CA096940, R01CA127617)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
adjuvant endocrine therapy, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, treatment decision-making, patient-physician communication, sociodemographic factors, educational intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Prospective Studies, Quality of Health Care, Receptors, Cell Surface, Regression Analysis, Multivariate Analysis, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review