Non-initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Quality of Care study (BQUAL)
Open accessAbstract
Adjuvant hormonal therapy for non-metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer decreases risk of breast cancer recurrence and increases survival. However, some women do not initiate this life-saving treatment. We used a prospective cohort design to investigate factors related to non-initiation of hormonal therapy among women with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic HR-positive breast cancer recruited from three U.S. sites. Serial interviews were conducted at baseline and during treatment to examine sociodemographic factors, tumor characteristics, and treatment decision-making factors. Multivariate modeling assessed associations between variables of interest and hormonal therapy initiation. Of 1,050 breast cancer patients recruited, 725 (69%) had HR-positive breast cancer, of whom 87 (12.0%) based on self-report and 122 (16.8%) based on medical record/pharmacy fill rates did not initiate hormonal therapy. In a multivariable analysis, non-initiation of hormonal therapy, defined by medical record/pharmacy, was associated with having greater negative beliefs about efficacy of treatment (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.70). Non-initiation was less likely in those who found the quality of patient/physician communication to be higher (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), the hormonal therapy treatment decision an easy one to make (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.90) or neither easy nor difficult (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.58); and had more positive beliefs about hormonal therapy efficacy (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.34-0.62). Factors influencing non-initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy are complex and influenced by patient beliefs regarding treatment efficacy and side effects. Educational interventions to women about the benefits of hormonal therapy may decrease negative beliefs and increase hormone therapy initiation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient variables, social support, patient-provider communication, and healthcare factors such as cost are associated with adherence to systemic therapies in breast cancer survivors.
“Patient variables (e.g., age), social support, patient-provider communication, and healthcare factors (e.g., cost) have been associated with breast cancer survivor adherence to systemic therapies.6, 16-18”
From Behavioral interventions to enhance adherence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic literature review (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Survivors who reported lack of understandable information, not being told about side effects in advance, limited opportunity to ask questions at diagnosis, and never being asked about difficulties taking adjuvant hormonal therapy had lower adherence rates.
“There is also evidence that survivors who reported (1) lack of understandable information about treatment, (2) not being told about side effects in advance, (3) having limited opportunity to ask questions at the time of diagnosis, and (4) never having been asked about the difficulties of taking adjuvant hormonal therapy, exhibited lower rates of adherence to hormonal treatment.16-18”
From Behavioral interventions to enhance adherence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic literature review (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Social support is associated with higher adherence in a meta-analysis with various medical conditions and in several adjuvant hormonal therapy studies with breast cancer survivors.
“Social support has also been associated with higher adherence in a meta-analysis with various medical conditions46 and in several adjuvant hormonal therapy studies with breast cancer survivors.16, 17, 47”
From Behavioral interventions to enhance adherence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic literature review (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [38]Phillips KA Milne RL Buys S Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based Breast Cancer Family Registry J Clin Oncol 20 7 2005 23 21 4679 4686 15851764
- Authors
- Neugut, A. I., Hillyer, G. C., Kushi, L. H., Lamerato, L., Leoce, N., Nathanson, S. D., Ambrosone, C. B., Bovbjerg, D. H., Mandelblatt, J. S., Magai, C., Tsai, W.-Y., Jacobson, J. S., & Hershman, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
- Long Island University (US)
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Neugut, Alfred I.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Published
- 2012-04-22
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 419-428
- ISSN
- 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7217
- PMC
- PMC3561459
- OpenAlex
- W2028029314
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2r25ca094061-11)
- U.S. Public Health Service (127617)
- National Cancer Institute (R25-CA 094061, K05-CA96940, R43CA094601, U10CA84131, R25CA094601, R01CA105274, R01CA124924, U10CA084131, R01CA100598, K05CA096940, R01CA127617)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- adjuvant endocrine therapy, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, treatment decision-making, patient-physician communication, sociodemographic factors, educational intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Prospective Studies, Quality of Health Care, Receptors, Cell Surface, Regression Analysis, Multivariate Analysis, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review