High risk of in-breast tumor recurrence after BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the study was to compare breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (M) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Women with invasive breast cancer and a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were included in the study (n = 162). Patients treated with BCT (n = 45) were compared with patients treated with M (n = 118). Endpoints were local recurrence as first recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS), breast cancer death, and distant recurrence. Cumulative incidence was calculated in the presence of competing risks. For calculation of hazard ratios and for multivariable analysis, cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression was used. Compared to M, BCT was associated with an increased risk of LR in univariable analysis (HR 4.0; 95 % CI 1.6-9.8) and in multivariable analysis adjusting for tumor stage, age, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.9; CI 1.1-7.8). Following M, all local recurrences were seen in the first 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Following BCT, the rate of LR continued to be high also after the first 5 years. The cumulative incidence of LR in the BCT group was 15, 25, and 32 % after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between BCT and M for OS, breast cancer death, or distant recurrence. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers treated with BCT have a high risk of LR, many of which are new primary breast cancers. This must be thoroughly discussed with the patient and is an example of how rapid treatment-focused genetic testing could influence choice of treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women with a BRCA1/2 genetic mutation who have been treated for breast cancer are at increased risk of having a local recurrence or a second primary cancer.
“In addition to having an increased risk of developing a first breast cancer, women with a BRCA1/2 genetic mutation and who have been treated for breast cancer are also at an increased risk of having a local recurrence or a second primary cancer.”
From Fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1 or 2 genetic mutation : a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
The cumulative incidence of local recurrence in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 32% within 15 years after breast-conserving surgery and 9% within 15 years after total mastectomy.
“a study by Nilsson et al. [13] showed that the cumulative incidence of local recurrence in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 32% and 9% within 15 years after breast-conserving surgery (e.g., lumpectomy) and total mastectomy, respectively.”
From Fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1 or 2 genetic mutation : a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Nilsson, M. P., Hartman, L., Kristoffersson, U., Johannsson, O. T., Borg, Å., Henriksson, K., Lanke, E., Olsson, H., & Loman, N.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Nilsson, Martin P.
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Published
- 2014-09-04
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 571-578
- ISSN
- 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7217
- PMC
- PMC4174291
- OpenAlex
- W2032628103
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancerfonden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Keywords
- BRCA1 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, hereditary breast cancer, breast-conserving therapy, mastectomy, local recurrence, overall survival, distant recurrence, competing risks, genetic testing, treatment decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Mutation, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Mastectomy, Segmental, Survival Rate, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review