Cited by 107Sleep and related disordersCancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Evaluation and management of insomnia in women with breast cancer

Kwak, Agnes, Jacobs, Jamie, Haggett, Dana, Jimenez, Rachel, Peppercorn, Jeffrey·2020·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Purpose Insomnia is a common issue among patients with breast cancer with a potentially devastating impact on quality of life. It can be caused or exacerbated by multiple disease and treatment-related factors. Despite the prevalence and impact of insomnia, it is rarely addressed systematically in the oncology clinic. We conducted a comprehensive review of insomnia to guide clinical care of patient's with breast cancer and insomnia.Methods This manuscript reviews the prevalence, etiology, emerging science and both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic options for treatment of insomnia among patients with breast cancer.Results Multiple factors contribute to insomnia among patients with breast cancer including endocrine therapy and hotflashes, pain and discomfort from local therapy, and fear of recurrence. If we do identify insomnia, there are treatment options and strategies available to help patients. In particular, there is now a considerable body of evidence supporting the use of psychosocial interventions and behavioral treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), yoga, and mind-body programs. It is also important for oncology providers to be educated regarding available pharmacologic therapies and emerging data for cannabis-based therapy.Conclusion This manuscript provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the prevalence, etiology, and treatment approaches available for insomnia for clinicians treating patients with breast cancer. We also address strategies and goals for cancer care delivery and future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-020-05635-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 107

Authors
Kwak, A., Jacobs, J., Haggett, D., Jimenez, R., & Peppercorn, J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Peppercorn, Jeffrey
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2020-04-20
Volume
181
Issue
2
Pages
269-277
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W3016944219
Cited by
107
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
insomnia, breast cancer, women, endocrine therapy, hot flashes, cancer pain, fear of recurrence, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, yoga, mind-body interventions, cannabis-based therapy, non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacotherapy, quality of life, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Prognosis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review