CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Choice Architecture on Sustainable Consumer Behavior: The Role of Guilt

Theotokis, Aristeidis, Manganari, Emmanouela·2015·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2287-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-014-2287-4

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Agnew, R.J., Anderson, L.R., Gerlach, J.R., & Szykman, L.R. (2008). Who Chooses Annuities? An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Gender, Framing, and Defaults. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Twentieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 98 (May), 418–422 · DOI
  2. Ansher, C., Ariely, D., Nagler, A., Rudd, M., Schwartz, J., & Shah, A. (2013). Better medicine by default. Medical Decision Making,. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13507339 . · DOI
  3. Baron, M. R., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Basil, Z. D., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035–1054. · DOI
  5. Brennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 140–146. · DOI
  6. Brown, L. C., & Krishna, A. (2004). The Skeptical Shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(December), 529–539. · DOI
  7. Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 197–207. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232–239. · DOI
  9. Carroll, D. G., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B., & Metrick, A. (2009). Optimal defaults and active decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1639–1674. · DOI
  10. Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2003). Optimal defaults. The American Economic Review, 93(2), 180–185. · DOI
  11. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2002). The science and practice of persuasion. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 40–50. · DOI
  12. Cotte, J., Coulter, R. A., & Moore, M. (2005). Enhancing or disrupting guilt: The role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent. Journal of Business Research, 58, 361–368. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dahl, D. W., Honea, H., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). Three Rs of interpersonal consumer guilt: Relationship, reciprocity, reparation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 307–315. · DOI
  14. Folse, J. A. G., Niedrich, R. W., & Landreth, G. S. (2010). Cause-relating marketing: The effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295–309. · DOI
  15. Goldstein, N. J., Griskevicius, V., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Reciprocity by proxy: A novel influence strategy for stimulating cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 441–473. · DOI
  16. Goldstein, G. D., Johnson, E. J., Herrmann, A., & Heitmann, M. (2008b). Nudge your customers toward better choices. Harvard Business Review, 86(December), 99–105.
  17. Greenspan, S. P. (1995). Moral residues. In P. S. Greenspan (Ed.), Practical guilt: Moral dilemmas, emotions, and social norms (pp. 109–177). New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  18. Haws, L.K., Winterich, K.P., & Naylor, R. (2013). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, In Press, Corrected Proof, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002 · DOI
  19. Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723–742. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Huhmann, A. B., & Brotherton, T. P. (1997). A content analysis of guilt appeals in popular magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 26(Summer), 35–46. · DOI
  21. Hui, M. K., & Bateson, J. E. G. (1991). Perceived control and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on the service experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 174–184. · DOI
  22. Izard, E. C. (1977). Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Keller, A. P., Bari Harlam, B., Loewenstein, G., & Volpp, K. G. (2011). Enhanced active choice: A new method to motivate behavior change. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 376–383. · DOI
  24. Kelley, W. S., Donnelly, J. H., & Skinner, S. J. (1990). Customer participation in service production and delivery. Journal of Retailing, 66(Fall), 315–335.
  25. Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., & Eva Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: a multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 193–204. · DOI
  26. Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2011). Go Green! Should Environmental Messages Be So Assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 95–102. · DOI
  27. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55. · DOI
  28. Lascu, N. D. (1991). Consumer guilt: Examining the potential of a new marketing construct. In R. Holman & M. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 18, pp. 290–293). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
  29. Luchs, G. M., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(September), 18–31. · DOI
  30. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 28–281. · DOI
  31. MacIntosh, E. (2012). Eco packaging. Marketing, 00253650, 36–37.
  32. Madrian, C. B., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behaviour. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149–1187. · DOI
  33. Marlin, B. (2011). E-Statements: Encouraging conversions. ABA Bank Marketing, 43(5), 14–19.
  34. Mazar, N., & Zhong, C.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494–498. · DOI
  35. McMillen, L. D. (1971). Transgression, self-image and compliant behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 176–179. · DOI
  36. Menz, C. F. (2005). Green electricity policies in the United States: Case study. Energy Policy, 33(18), 2398–2410. · DOI
  37. Meuter, M., Ostrom, A., Bitner, M., & Roundtree, R. (2003). The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research, 56, 899–906. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Mosher, L. D. (1980). Guilt. In R. H. Woody (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Clinical Assessment (pp. 602–613). Washington: D.C., Bass.
  39. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(8), 852–863. · DOI
  40. Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K. A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., et al. (2010). Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 4–36. · DOI
  41. Park, J. K., Han, H., & Park, J. H. (2013). Psychological antecedents and risk on attitudes towards e-customization. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2252–2559.
  42. Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., & MacInnis, D. J. (2000). Choosing what i want versus rejecting what i do not want: An application of decision framing to product option choice decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 187–202. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119. · DOI
  44. Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640. · DOI
  45. Robinson, R. S., Irmak, C., & Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126–139. · DOI
  46. Shang, J., Basil, D. Z., & Wymer, W. (2010). Using social marketing to enhance hotel reuse programs. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 166–172. · DOI
  47. Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105–118. · DOI
  48. Spital, A. (1995). Mandated choice: A plan to increase public commitment to organ donation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 504–506. · DOI
  49. Sternthal, B., Tybout, A. M., & Calder, B. J. (1994). Experimental design; generalization and theoretical explanation. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles of marketing research (pp. 195–223). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  50. Sunstein, C.R., & Reisch, L.A. (2013). Automatically Green: Behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review, Forthcoming. · DOI
  51. Thaler, H. R., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  52. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The self in self-conscious emotions. A cognitive appraisal approach. In L. T. Jessica, W. R. Richard, & P. T. June (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford.
  53. White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It’s the mind-set that matters: the role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(June), 472–485. · DOI
  54. White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76, 103–118. · DOI
  55. White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124. · DOI
  56. Wunderlich, P., Kranz, J., Totzek, D., Veit, D., & Picot, A. (2013). The impact of endogenous motivations on adoption of it-enabled services: The case of transformative services in the energy sector. Journal of Service Research,. doi: 10.1177/1094670512474841 . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Theotokis, A., & Manganari, E.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-07-19
Volume
131
Issue
2
Pages
423-437
ISSN
  • 0167-4544
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-014-2287-4
Cited by
129
References
8
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review