The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented
Open accessAbstract
We investigate how conventional asset managers account for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in their investment process. We do so on the basis of an international survey among fund managers. We find that many conventional managers integrate responsible investing in their investment process. Furthermore, we find that ESG information in particular is being used for red flagging and to manage risk. We find that many conventional fund managers have already adopted features of responsible investing in the investment process. Furthermore, we argue and show that ESG investing is highly similar to fundamental investing. We also reveal that there is a substantial difference in the ways in which U.S. and European asset managers view ESG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 · Cited by 2,601
The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716 · Cited by 965 · cited 2×
“For instance, Derwall et al. (2005) find that equity portfolios with high scores on eco-efficiency (the economic value added relative to the waste produced) score higher riskadjusted returns than portfolios with low scores on eco-efficiency.”
Cited by
Buallay, A. (2019) · Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-12-2017-0149 · Cited by 936
How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy
Clementino, E., & Perkins, R. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4 · Cited by 486
Doing well by doing good: a systematic review and research agenda for sustainable investment
Talan, G., & Sharma, G. D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020353 · Cited by 192
Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance
Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z · Cited by 143
How to design an AI ethics board
Schuett, J., Reuel, A.-K., & Carlier, A. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00409-y · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2015-03-19
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 525-533
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W1990027844
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8
- The paper
- van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
