The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective
Reitz, H. J., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257794 · Cited by 9,172
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258888 · Cited by 7,838
From the New York Times Magazine
Minsky, & Hyman, P. (1979) · Cited by 6,899
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259247 · Cited by 5,039
Ireland, R. D., Elfring, T., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2011) · In Search of Research Excellence · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00017 · Cited by 4,553
INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS
Jones, T. M. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924 · Cited by 3,102
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions
Freeman, R. E. (1994) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3857340 · Cited by 2,801
Cited by
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
Current perceptions on the problem of modern slavery in business
Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2018) · Business Strategy & Development · doi:10.1002/bsd2.15 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2015-07-08
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-459
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W796233062
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 41.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-015-2741-y
- The paper
- Miles, S. (2017). Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2741-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
