Cited by 172Workplace Spirituality and LeadershipLeadership and Management in OrganizationsJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

SLBS-6: Validation of a Short Form of the Servant Leadership Behavior Scale

Sendjaya, Sen, Eva, Nathan, Butar Butar, Ivan, Robin, Mulyadi, Castles, Samantha·2019·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-017-3594-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 172

Authors
Sendjaya, S., Eva, N., Butar Butar, I., Robin, M., & Castles, S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Sendjaya, Sen
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2017-05-31
Volume
156
Issue
4
Pages
941-956
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2617933470
Cited by
172
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
19.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
servant leadership, short-form scale, scale validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, construct validity, spiritual leadership, holistic leadership, leadership training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review