Point and interval estimates of partial population attributable risks in cohort studies: examples and software.
Abstract
The concept of the population attributable risk (PAR) percent has found widespread application in public health research. This quantity describes the proportion of a disease which could be prevented if a specific exposure were to be eliminated from a target population. We present methods for obtaining point and interval estimates of partial PARs, where the impact on disease burden for some presumably modifiable determinants is estimated in, and applied to, a cohort study. When the disease is multifactorial, the partial PAR must, in general, be used to quantify the proportion of disease which can be prevented if a specific exposure or group of exposures is eliminated from a target population, while the distribution of other modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors is unchanged. The methods are illustrated in a study of risk factors for bladder cancer incidence (Michaud DS et al., New England J Med 340 (1999) 1390). A user-friendly SAS macro implementing the methods described in this paper is available via the worldwide web.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If there is correlation between exposure and disease-specific mortality due to correlations with other risks or unobserved factors, the equations may under- or over-estimate the true population-attributable fraction when used with adjusted relative risks.
“However, if there is also a correlation between exposure and disease-specific mortality, due to correlations of exposure with other risks or other unobserved factors, the above equations may result in under- (when there is positive correlation) or over-estimation (negative correlation) of the true PAF when used with adjusted RRs [32]–[36].”
From The Preventable Causes of Death in the United States: Comparative Risk Assessment of Dietary, Lifestyle, and Metabolic Risk Factors (2009) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 298
- Authors
- Spiegelman, D., Hertzmark, E., & Wand, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Spiegelman, D.
- Venue
- Cancer Causes & Control
- Published
- 2007-03-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 571-579
- ISSN
- 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7225
- OpenAlex
- W2147687825
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- interval estimation, cohort studies, modifiable risk factors, complex diseases, bladder cancer, SAS macro, disease burden
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Drinking Behavior, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Primary Prevention, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Smoking, Software, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Poisson Distribution, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review