Cited by 113Vitamin D Research StudiesSkin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentation

Sun protective behaviors and vitamin D levels in the US population: NHANES 2003–2006

Open access
Linos, Eleni, Keiser, Elizabeth, Kanzler, Matthew, Sainani, Kristin L., Lee, Wayne, Vittinghoff, Eric, Chren, Mary-Margaret, Tang, Jean Y.·2012·Cancer Causes & Control

Abstract

Background Sun protection is recommended for skin cancer prevention, yet little is known about the role of sun protection on vitamin D levels. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between different types of sun protective behaviors and serum 25(OH)D levels in the general US population.Methods Cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of 5,920 adults aged 18-60 years in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006. We analyzed questionnaire responses on sun protective behaviors: staying in the shade, wearing long sleeves, wearing a hat, using sunscreen and SPF level. Analyses were adjusted for multiple confounders of 25(OH)D levels and stratified by race. Our primary outcome measures were serum 25(OH)D levels (ng/ml) measured by radioimmunoassay and vitamin D deficiency, defined as 25(OH)D levels <20 ng/ml.Results Staying in the shade and wearing long sleeves were significantly associated with lower 25(OH)D levels. Subjects who reported frequent use of shade on a sunny day had -3.5 ng/ml (p (trend) < 0.001) lower 25(OH)D levels compared to subjects who reported rare use. Subjects who reported frequent use of long sleeves had -2.2 ng/ml (p (trend) = 0.001) lower 25(OH)D levels. These associations were strongest for whites, and did not reach statistical significance among Hispanics or blacks. White participants who reported frequently staying in the shade or wearing long sleeves had double the odds of vitamin D deficiency compared with those who rarely did so. Neither wearing a hat nor using sunscreen was associated with low 25(OH)D levels or vitamin D deficiency.Conclusions White individuals who protect themselves from the sun by seeking shade or wearing long sleeves may have lower 25(OH)D levels and be at risk for vitamin D deficiency. Frequent sunscreen use does not appear to be linked to vitamin D deficiency in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10552-011-9862-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In NHANES 2003-2006, Hispanics and Blacks had lower 25(OH)D levels than Whites on average, but photoprotection behaviors (shade, long sleeves, hat, sunscreen) were not associated with significant decrease in 25(OH)D in Hispanics and Blacks; sunscreen use was associated with increased 25(OH)D levels among Black participants.

    “In fact, sunscreen use was associated with increased 25(OH)D levels among Black participants [137], possibly due to increased sun exposure or insufficient application/reapplication of sunscreen.”

    From Photoprotection for skin of color (2022) · cites this paper as [137]

  • Vitamin D synthesis is not inhibited by sunscreen use, but strict physical avoidance of sunlight increases risk of vitamin D deficiency.

    “Importantly, vitamin D synthesis is not inhibited by sunscreen use145, but strict physical avoidance of sunlight increases risk of vitamin D deficiency145,146.”

    From Mechanisms and prevention of <scp>UV</scp>‐induced melanoma (2018) · cites this paper as [145]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 113

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]AMA http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/39/sunteen.pdf

Authors
Linos, E., Keiser, E., Kanzler, M., Sainani, K. L., Lee, W., Vittinghoff, E., Chren, M.-M., & Tang, J. Y.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Linos, Eleni
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2011-11-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
133-140
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W2077933143
Cited by
113
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23AR056736)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
sun protection behavior, vitamin D levels, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D deficiency, sunscreen use, sun protection, shade seeking, skin cancer prevention, racial differences, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Protective Clothing, Sunlight, Sunscreening Agents, United States, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review