Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesions in Denmark, 1997–2012
Abstract
Purpose The incidence of cervical cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), has been decreasing in several developed countries since the onset of organized screening programs; in some countries, however, the incidence of adenocarcinoma has increased among young women. We investigated the Danish incidence trends during 1997-2011 when cervical screening coverage was high. Incidences of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) were also assessed, with the latest part of the study period coinciding with introduction of free-of-charge human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Methods Using nationwide registries, we estimated age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Results The incidence of SCC decreased significantly, especially in women aged ≥45 years [EAPC: -3.1 % (95 % CI -4.3 to -2.5)], whereas the incidence of adenocarcinoma increased significantly, from 2.4 to 3.1/100,000 primarily due to increases in women aged ≤44 years [EAPC: 4.3 % (95 % CI 1.8-6.7)]. The incidences of CIN3 and AIS increased significantly from 94.7 to 156.5/100,000 and 3.3 to 11.3/100,000, respectively, but, importantly, they decreased significantly during 2009-2012 in women aged ≤20 years. Conclusions The Danish screening program has successfully reduced the incidence of cervical cancer, especially of SCC in older women; however, the program has not significantly reduced the incidence in young women or…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent trend analyses reveal an increasing burden of cervical cancer, even in countries with well organized screening programs based on cytology and good coverage.
“However, recent trend analyses reveal an increasing burden of cervical cancer, even in countries with well organized screening programs based on cytology and good coverage.8 9 10 11 12”
From Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arbyn, M., Smith, S. B., Temin, S., Sultana, F., & Castle, P. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4823 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baldur-Felskov, B., Munk, C., Nielsen, T. S. S., Dehlendorff, C., Kirschner, B., Junge, J., & Kjaer, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Danish Cancer Society (DK)
- Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
- Venue
- Cancer Causes & Control
- Published
- 2015-06-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1105-1116
- ISSN
- 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7225
- OpenAlex
- W560716213
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The MERMAID II project
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- cervical cancer incidence, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, incidence trends, cervical cancer screening, HPV vaccination, young women, Denmark
- MeSH terms
- Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Denmark, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Incidence, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review