Cited by 76Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningWomen's cancer prevention and management

Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesions in Denmark, 1997–2012

Baldur-Felskov, Birgitte, Munk, Christian, Nielsen, Thor Schütt Svane, Dehlendorff, Christian, Kirschner, Benny, Junge, Jette, Kjaer, Susanne K.·2015·Cancer Causes & Control

Abstract

Purpose The incidence of cervical cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), has been decreasing in several developed countries since the onset of organized screening programs; in some countries, however, the incidence of adenocarcinoma has increased among young women. We investigated the Danish incidence trends during 1997-2011 when cervical screening coverage was high. Incidences of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) were also assessed, with the latest part of the study period coinciding with introduction of free-of-charge human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Methods Using nationwide registries, we estimated age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Results The incidence of SCC decreased significantly, especially in women aged ≥45 years [EAPC: -3.1 % (95 % CI -4.3 to -2.5)], whereas the incidence of adenocarcinoma increased significantly, from 2.4 to 3.1/100,000 primarily due to increases in women aged ≤44 years [EAPC: 4.3 % (95 % CI 1.8-6.7)]. The incidences of CIN3 and AIS increased significantly from 94.7 to 156.5/100,000 and 3.3 to 11.3/100,000, respectively, but, importantly, they decreased significantly during 2009-2012 in women aged ≤20 years. Conclusions The Danish screening program has successfully reduced the incidence of cervical cancer, especially of SCC in older women; however, the program has not significantly reduced the incidence in young women or…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10552-015-0603-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldur-Felskov, B., Munk, C., Nielsen, T. S. S., Dehlendorff, C., Kirschner, B., Junge, J., & Kjaer, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2015-06-02
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1105-1116
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W560716213
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The MERMAID II project
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
cervical cancer incidence, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, incidence trends, cervical cancer screening, HPV vaccination, young women, Denmark
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Denmark, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Incidence, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review