Cited by 176Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsMechanisms of cancer metastasisTGF-β signaling in diseases

RECK—a newly discovered inhibitor of metastasis with prognostic significance in multiple forms of cancer

Clark, Jonathan C. M., Thomas, David M., Choong, Peter F. M., Dass, Crispin R.·2007·Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

Abstract

The RECK (reversion-inducing cysteine rich protein with Kazal motifs) protein was initially discovered by its ability to induce reversion in ras-activated fibroblasts. The key action of RECK is to inhibit matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) involved in breakdown of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and angiogenesis-namely MMP-2, MMP-9 and MTP-1. To this effect, it plays important physiological roles in embryogenesis and vasculogenesis. Additionally, it has a significant effect on tumorigenesis by limiting angiogenesis and invasion of tumours through the ECM. RECK has been studied in the context of a number of human tumours including colorectal, breast, pancreas, gastric, hepatocellular, prostate, and non-small cell lung carcinoma. In many of these tumours, RECK is down-regulated most likely as a result of inhibition at the Sp1 promoter site. MMP-2 and MMP-9 generally show an inverse association with RECK expression, but there are exceptions to this rule. Likewise, a reduction in tumour microvascular density (MVD) and VEGF have also been correlated with increased RECK levels, although more studies are required to define this effect. The predominant finding across all human tumour studies is a significantly improved prognosis (due to decreased invasion and metastasis) in tumours with preserved RECK expression. Although further research is required, RECK is a promising prognostic marker and potential therapeutic agent in multiple cancers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10555-007-9093-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, J. C. M., Thomas, D. M., Choong, P. F. M., & Dass, C. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Dass, Crispin R.
Venue
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
Published
2007-09-09
Volume
26
Issue
3-4
Pages
675-683
ISSN
  • 0167-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7233
OpenAlex
W2072653331
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mechanisms of cancer metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
RECK, metastasis suppression, prognostic factors, matrix metalloproteinase inhibition, MMP-2, MMP-9, angiogenesis, tumor invasion, extracellular matrix, vascular endothelial growth factor, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Humans, Membrane Glycoproteins, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Down-Regulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, GPI-Linked Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review