Cited by 6Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily and Disability Support ResearchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Impact of Youth Problem Type on Specific Dimensions of Caregiver Strain in Latino Families

Galvan, Thania, Gudiño, Omar G.·2020·Child & Youth Care Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10566-020-09554-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 6

Authors
Galvan, T., & Gudiño, O. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Galvan, Thania
Venue
Child & Youth Care Forum
Published
2020-05-27
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
759-767
ISSN
  • 1053-1890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3319
OpenAlex
W3031164769
Cited by
6
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child & Youth Care Forum (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U01 MH55282)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
caregiver burden, Latino families, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, youth age, mental health service utilization, Patterns of Care Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review