Cited by 15Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Psychometric Evaluation of a Barriers to Mental Health Treatment Questionnaire for Latina/o/x Caregivers of Children and Adolescents

Open access
Vázquez, Alejandro L., Culianos, Demi, Flores, Cynthia M. Navarro, Alvarez, María de la Caridad, Barrett, Tyson S., Domenech Rodríguez, Melanie M.·2022·Child & Youth Care Forum

Abstract

Background Knowledge regarding barriers faced by Latina/o/x caregivers in accessing youth mental health services (MHS) have largely depended on resource intensive interview-based assessments.Objective We evaluated a questionnaire for Latina/o/x caregivers of youths that presents a briefer and more feasible alternative.Method We conducted a psychometric evaluation of the Barriers to Treatment Questionnaire - Latina/o/x Caregivers (BTQ-LC) with a sample of 598 Latina/o/x caregivers from across the United States. Descriptive statistics and confirmatory factor analyses were used to identify common barriers to services, confirm the factor structure of the scale, and establish construct validity.Results Descriptive statistics suggest that not knowing where and how to access services, and normalization of youth psychopathology were the most frequently reported barriers among caregivers of youth with clinically elevated problems on the CBCL. Confirmatory factor analysis suggests that the BTQ-LC was best represented by a three-factor structure: (1) structural, (2) perceptions regarding mental health problems, and (3) services. Our finding suggest that the BTQ-LC could also be used as a single factor as fit indices ranged from acceptable to poor. BTQ-LC scales were all negatively correlated with the utilization of common youth MHS (i.e., psychological counseling, medical doctors, school professionals).Conclusions The BTQ-LC represents an important step towards improving our understanding and assessment of barriers to services contributing to mental health disparities among Latina/o/x youths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10566-021-09656-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 15

Authors
Vázquez, A. L., Culianos, D., Flores, C. M. N., Alvarez, M. D. L. C., Barrett, T. S., & Domenech Rodríguez, M. M.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vázquez, Alejandro L.
Venue
Child & Youth Care Forum
Published
2021-10-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
847-864
ISSN
  • 1053-1890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3319
OpenAlex
W3202727742
Cited by
15
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child & Youth Care Forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
barriers to mental health care, child and adolescent mental health services, access to services, mental health disparities, scale development, factor structure, construct validity, service utilization, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review