Perfectionism in Pediatric Anxiety and Depressive Disorders
Abstract
Although perfectionism has been identified as a factor in many psychiatric disorders across the life span, it is relatively understudied in pediatric anxiety and depressive disorders. Furthermore, there exists little cohesion among previous research, restricting the conclusions that can be made across studies. In this review, research associating perfectionism with pediatric anxiety and depression is examined and a framework is presented synthesizing research to date. We focus on detailing the current understanding of how perfectionism develops and interacts with other developmental features characteristic of anxiety and depression in children and potential pathways that result in anxiety and depressive disorders. This includes: how perfectionism is measured in children, comparisons with relevant adult literature, the development of perfectionism in children and adolescents, mediators and moderators of the link between perfectionism and anxiety and depression, and the role of perfectionism in treatment and prevention of these disorders. We also present research detailing perfectionism across cultures. Findings from these studies are beginning to implicate perfectionism as an underlying process that may contribute broadly to the development of anxiety and depression in a pediatric population. Throughout the review, difficulties, limitations, and gaps in the current understanding are presented while offering suggestions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evaluative Concerns was strongly correlated with anxiety and depression in the quantitative findings.
“Consistent with findings from previous studies, Evaluative Concerns, comprised of excessive concern over mistakes and doubting one's actions was strongly correlated with anxiety and depression (Affrunti & Woodruff-Borden, 2014) as evidenced in the quantitative findings.”
From Maladaptive Perfectionism, Disguised Distress, and Help Seeking in the Culture of 'Saving Face': Links to Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms among Asian Youth (2019) · cites this paper as Affrunti & Woodruff-Borden, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 167 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Affrunti, N. W., & Woodruff-Borden, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Affrunti, Nicholas W.
- Venue
- Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
- Published
- 2014-01-31
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-317
- ISSN
- 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2827
- OpenAlex
- W2073211935
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 167
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- perfectionism, childhood anxiety disorders, childhood depression, children and adolescents, mediators and moderators, cross-cultural comparison, prevention and treatment, developmental pathways
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Development, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Personality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review