Cited by 64Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Reducing Poverty-Related Disparities in Child Development and School Readiness: The Smart Beginnings Tiered Prevention Strategy that Combines Pediatric Primary Care with Home Visiting

Open access
Shaw, Daniel S., Mendelsohn, Alan L., Morris, Pamela A.·2021·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

This paper describes the Smart Beginnings Integrated Model, an innovative, tiered approach for addressing school readiness disparities in low-income children from birth to age 3 in the United States through universal engagement of low-income families and primary prevention in pediatric primary care integrated with secondary/tertiary prevention in the home. We build on both public health considerations, in which engagement, cost and scalability are paramount, and a developmental psychopathology framework (Cicchetti & Toth, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 50:16-25, 2009), in which the child is considered within the context of the proximal caregiving environment. Whereas existing early preventive models have shown promise in promoting children's school readiness, the Smart Beginnings model addresses three important barriers that have limited impacts at the individual and/or population level: (1) identification and engagement of vulnerable families; (2) the challenges of scalability at low cost within existing service systems; and (3) tailoring interventions to address the heterogeneity of risk among low-income families. Smart Beginnings takes advantage of the existing platform of pediatric primary care to provide a universal primary prevention strategy for all families (Video Interaction Project) and a targeted secondary/tertiary prevention strategy (Family Check-Up) for families with additional contextual factors. We describe the theory underlying the Smart Beginnings model, some initial findings from its recent application in two cities, and implications for changing social policy to promote school readiness beginning during very early childhood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-021-00366-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-quality child care, after-school activities, and safe outdoor play are often contingent on the structural resources that support families.

    “High-quality child care, after-school activities, and safe outdoor play are often contingent on the structural resources that support families.16,51”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The 'Implications of Smart Beginnings' section describes inequality of resources and opportunity for families, and 'Preventing Poverty-Related Disparities through Supporting Early Relational Health' discusses barriers to obtaining resources for children’s development. These passages support the general connection between family resources and children’s opportunities, but the paper does not specifically address access to high-quality child care, after-school activities, or safe outdoor play. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 124 · Cited by 64

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Canfield, C., Miller, E.B., Shaw, D., Morris, P., & Mendelsohn, A. (2020a, May 4). Increasing reach of preventive programs through a tiered approach tailored to heterogeneity in risk. To have been presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting. (conference canceled)
  2. Dudek E Henschen E Finkle E Vyas S Fiszbein D Shukla A Improving continuity in a patient centered medical home Pediatrics 2018 142 1 10.1542/peds.142.1_MeetingAbstract.366 · DOI

Authors
Shaw, D. S., Mendelsohn, A. L., & Morris, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Daniel S.
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
2021-09-09
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
669-683
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W3198680801
Cited by
64
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD076390)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
school readiness, low-income children, home visiting, Family Check-Up, developmental psychopathology, family involvement, early childhood intervention, scalability, social policy
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Family, Humans, Poverty, Primary Health Care, Schools, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review