PETREL19: a new numerical solution of planetary and lunar ephemeris
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
General-relativistic celestial mechanics. I. Method and definition of reference systems
Damour, T., Soffel, M., & Xu, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3273 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Di Ruscio, A., Fienga, A., Durante, D., Iess, L., Laskar, J., & Gastineau, M. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037920 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Tian, W.
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Wei
- ORCID
- Tian, Wei
- Venue
- Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
- Published
- 2023-06-20
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0923-2958 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9478
- OpenAlex
- W4381322894
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- planetary ephemerides, lunar ephemeris, weighted least squares fitting, solar system dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
