Underwaterwriting: from theory to empiricism in regional mortgage markets in the U.S.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one study of 37 U.S. cities, formerly redlined areas (i.e., D graded) have about 23% tree canopy coverage, whereas areas with the highest grading (i.e., A and B) have about 43% coverage today.
“in one study of 37 U.S. cities, formerly redlined areas (i.e., D graded) have about 23% tree canopy coverage, whereas areas with the highest grading (i.e., A and B) have about 43% coverage today.214”
From NPCC4: Advancing climate justice in climate adaptation strategies for New York City (2024) · cites this paper as [214]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Keenan, J. M., & Bradt, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keenan, Jesse M.
- Venue
- Climatic Change
- Published
- 2020-06-04
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2043-2067
- ISSN
- 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1480
- OpenAlex
- W3033424259
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Keywords
- mortgage market, climate risk, sea level rise, floods, information asymmetry, soft information, mortgage securitization, coastal areas, Gulf Coast, regional credit markets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
