Cited by 64Genetic diversity and population structureWildlife Ecology and ConservationForensic and Genetic Research

North American montane red foxes: expansion, fragmentation, and the origin of the Sacramento Valley red fox

Open access
Sacks, Benjamin N., Statham, Mark J., Perrine, John D., Wisely, Samantha M., Aubry, Keith B.·2010·Conservation Genetics

Abstract

Most native red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) in the western contiguous United States appear to be climatically restricted to colder regions in the major mountain ranges and, in some areas, have suffered precipitous declines in abundance that may be linked to warming trends. However, another population of unknown origin has occurred in arid habitats in the Sacramento Valley of California well outside this narrow bioclimatic niche since at least 1880. If native, this population would be ecologically distinct among indigenous North American red foxes. We used mitochondrial and microsatellite markers from historical and modern samples (modes: 1910–1930 and 2000–2008, respectively) obtained throughout the western United States to determine the origins of the Sacramento Valley red fox, and assess the historical and modern connectivity and genetic effective population sizes of Sacramento Valley and montane red foxes. We found clear and consistent evidence supporting the indigenous origin of the Sacramento Valley population, including the phylogenetic positioning of the dominant, endemic mtDNA clade and microsatellite clustering of the Sacramento Valley population with the nearest montane population. Based on both mitochondrial and microsatellite AMOVAs, connectivity among Western populations of red foxes declined substantially between historical and modern time periods. Estimates based on temporal losses in gene diversity for both marker types suggest that both the Sierra Nevada (including the Southern Cascades population) and the Sacramento Valley populations have small genetic effective population sizes. Significant heterozygote excesses also indicate the occurrence of recent bottlenecks in these populations. Both substitutions distinguishing the 2 endemic Sacramento Valley haplotypes from the dominant montane haplotype were in the coding region and nonsynonymous, consistent with adaptive differences. These findings along with previously reported body size distinctions between Sacramento Valley and montane red foxes argue for distinct subspecific status for the Sacramento Valley red fox, for which we propose the designation V. v. patwin n. subsp. The small genetic effective population size estimates for the Sierra Nevada red fox and Sacramento Valley red fox are cause for concern, as is the possibility of genetic introgression into the latter population from an adjacent, recently established nonnative population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10592-010-0053-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expansion of wolves may provide positive outcomes for some lineages of montane red foxes that are potentially threatened by coyote predation.

    “The expansion of wolves may also provide positive outcomes for some lineages of montane red foxes that are potentially threatened by coyote predation (Sacks et al. 2010).”

    From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Sacks et al. 2010

    In the section on taxonomic implications for the Cascade red fox (page unavailable), the paper says anecdotal evidence links a decline in Sacramento Valley red fox abundance with an increase in coyotes. It does not say coyotes preyed on those foxes or discuss whether expanding wolves could benefit them. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 64

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Aubry KB (1983) The Cascade red fox: distribution, morphology, zoogeography and ecology. Dissertation, University of Wash- ington, Seattle Aubry KB (1984) The recent history and present distribution of the red fox in Washington. Northwest Sci 58:69-79
  2. Grinnell J, Dixon JS, Linsdale JM (1937) Fur-bearing mammals of California. University of California Press, Berkeley
  3. Hall ER (1981) The mammals of North America, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
  4. Ingles LG (1965) Mammals of the Pacific states: California, Oregon, and Washington. Stanford University Press, Stanford
  5. Jameson EW Jr, Peeters HJ (1988) California mammals. California Natural History Guides 52. University of California Press, Berkeley
  6. Kamler JF, Ballard WB (2002) A review of native and nonnative red foxes in North America. Wildl Soc Bull 30:370-379
  7. Moore M (2009) Impacts of encroaching nonnative red foxes on the Sacramento Valley red fox. Thesis, California State University, Sacramento
  8. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York
  9. Perrine JD (2005) Ecology of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Lassen Peak region of California, USA. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
  10. Perrine JD, Campbell LA, Green GA (in press) Conservation assessment for the Sierra Nevada red fox. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-XXX, Vallejo, California
  11. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Authors
Sacks, B. N., Statham, M. J., Perrine, J. D., Wisely, S. M., & Aubry, K. B.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Sacramento (US)
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Sacks, Benjamin N.
Venue
Conservation Genetics
Published
2010-06
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
1523-1539
ISSN
  • 1566-0621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9737
OpenAlex
W2103472178
Cited by
64
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Conservation Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • California Department of Fish and Game
  • Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game
  • University of Washington
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • University of California, Davis
  • California State University, Sacramento
  • California State University, Chico
  • Burke Museum, University of Washington
  • Pacific Northwest Research Station
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
red fox, population origin, genetic connectivity, population bottleneck, heterozygote excess, mtDNA clades, adaptive substitutions, subspecies designation, Sierra Nevada, global warming, genetic diversity loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review