Adverse Impact of Coercive Treatments on Psychiatric Inpatients’ Satisfaction with Care
Abstract
Consumers' satisfaction with inpatient mental health care is recognized as a key quality indicator that prospectively predicts functional and clinical outcomes. Coercive treatment experience is a frequently cited source of dissatisfaction with inpatient care, yet more research is needed to understand the factors that influence consumers' perceptions of coercion and its effects on satisfaction, including potential "downstream" effects of past coercive events on current treatment satisfaction. The current study examined associations between objective and subjective indices of coercive treatments and patients' satisfaction with care in a psychiatric inpatient sample (N = 240). Lower satisfaction ratings were independently associated with three coercive treatment variables: current involuntary admission, perceived coercion during current admission, and self-reported history of being refused a requested medication. Albeit preliminary, these results document associations between patients' satisfaction ratings and their subjective experiences of coercion during both current and prior hospitalizations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four studies found no negative effect on patient satisfaction or dignity.
“However, four studies found no negative effect on patient satisfaction or dignity (112–114).”
From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Strauss, J. L., Zervakis, J. B., Stechuchak, K. M., Olsen, M. K., Swanson, J., Swartz, M. S., Weinberger, M., Marx, C. E., Calhoun, P. S., Bradford, D. W., Butterfield, M. I., & Oddone, E. Z.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Duke University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Strauss, Jennifer L.
- Venue
- Community Mental Health Journal
- Published
- 2012-09-28
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-465
- ISSN
- 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2789
- OpenAlex
- W2072051348
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- involuntary treatment, patient satisfaction, psychiatric inpatients, involuntary admission, perceived coercion, medication refusal, mental health care quality, patient experience
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Severity of Illness Index, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review