CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229Knowledge Management and SharingInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationExpert finding and Q&A systems

Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management

Ackerman, Mark S., Dachtera, Juri, Pipek, Volkmar, Wulf, Volker·2013·Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
DOI 10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 246 · Cited by 229

Authors
Ackerman, M. S., Dachtera, J., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Siegen (DE)
Corresponding author
Ackerman, Mark S.
ORCID
Venue
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-08
Volume
22
Issue
4-6
Pages
531-573
ISSN
  • 0925-9724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7551
DOI
10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8
OpenAlex
W1993404314
Cited by
229
References
246
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
54.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
Keywords
knowledge management, knowledge sharing, expertise sharing, computer-supported cooperative work, practice-based perspective, human communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review