Mindfulness, Depression and Modes of Mind
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
General vulnerability (characteristics of the human condition that predispose us to distress) and specific vulnerabilities (particular patterns, traits or tendencies) co-exist.
“This analysis is based on an understanding that general vulnerability (characteristics of the human condition that predispose us to distress), and speci fi c vulnerabilities (particular patterns, traits or tendencies) co-exist (Williams, 2008).”
From What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft (2017) · cites this paper as Williams, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 238
- Authors
- Williams, J. M. G.
- Affiliations
- Warneford Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, J. Mark G.
- ORCID
- Williams, J. Mark G.
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 2008-08-22
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 721-733
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2058795214
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- mindfulness, depression, rumination, avoidance, perfectionism, mindfulness training, trait mindfulness, cognitive therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
