How Anxious are You Right Now? Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Evaluate the Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification for Social Threat Interpretations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In undergraduate students, SA was not related to a lower desire to be with others.
“These results are aligned with those of other 2 studies conducted on undergraduate students [54,83], which showed that SA was not related to a lower desire to be with others.”
From Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [83]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Daniel, K. E., Daros, A. R., Beltzer, M. L., Boukhechba, M., Barnes, L. E., & Teachman, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Daniel, Katharine E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 2020-03-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 538-556
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- OpenAlex
- W3011932788
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113752)
- University of Virginia Hobby Postdoctoral and Predoctoral Fellowship Grant
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- cognitive bias modification for interpretation, social anxiety, negative interpretation bias, ecological momentary assessment, online intervention, state anxiety, trait anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, target engagement, daily life monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
