Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Violent Stalkers. Detecting Risk Factors by the Police

Groenen, Anne, Vervaeke, Geert·2009·European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
DOI 10.1007/s10610-009-9103-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10610-009-9103-1

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice. New York: The McGraw Hill.
  2. Groenen, A. (2006). Stalking. Risk factors of physical violence [Risicofactoren van fysiek geweld]. Antwerpen: Maklu.
  3. James, D. V., & Farnham, F. R. (2006). In J. Hoffmann & H. G. W. Voß (Eds.), Psychologie Des Stalking (pp. 159–176). Frankfurt: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.
  4. Maris, E. (2003). Methods and techniques of psychology research, [Methoden en technieken van onderzoek in de psychologie]. Leuven: Acco.
  5. Wright, R. E. (1995). Logistic regression. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Groenen, A., & Vervaeke, G.
Venue
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-07-08
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
279-291
ISSN
  • 0928-1371
  • 1572-9869
DOI
10.1007/s10610-009-9103-1
Cited by
14
References
36
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.