A Tory High Modernism? Grand Plans and Visions of Order in Neoconservative Ontario
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Budgetary shifts dismantle social services in favour of deregulated market control.
“These budgetary shifts - all decisions that have avoidable outcomes - dismantle social services in favour of deregulated market control (McElligott, 2008; Roberts & Soederberg, 2014; Sudbury, 2008).”
From Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health (2025) · cites this paper as McElligott, 2008
Cites
South, N., & Weiss, R. P. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315078458 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health
Rinaldi, J. (2025) · Handbook on the Social Determinants of Health · doi:10.4337/9781035302093.00020
- Authors
- McElligott, G.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McElligott, Greg
- Venue
- Critical Criminology
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-144
- ISSN
- 0847-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1205-8629
- 1572-9877
- OpenAlex
- W2049064131
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
- Keywords
- penal reform, Ontario, neoconservatism, high modernism, James Scott, mass incarceration, penitentiary system, social order, practical knowledge, state reform, prison privatization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
