Cited by 36Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPolicing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Penology

Racial Threat and Crime Control: Integrating Theory on Race and Extending its Application

Smith, Justin·2021·Critical Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10612-019-09485-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other research has found evidence of disproportionately long sentence lengths for Native people convicted of crimes in general, longer than sentences for white and Latine people but shorter than those for Black people.

    “Other research has found evidence of disproportionately long sentence lengths for Native people convicted of crimes in general (longer than sentences for white and Latine people, but shorter than those for Black people) (J.Smith 2020; Franklin 2011).”

Authors
Smith, J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Justin
Venue
Critical Criminology
Published
2020-01-18
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
253-271
ISSN
  • 0847-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-8629
  • 1572-9877
OpenAlex
W2999885939
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
racial threat, crime control, racial bias, racial disparities, race relations, criminal justice system, structural racism, historical racism, criminological theory, epistemology of race

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review