The Good, the Bad, and the Uncertain: State Harm, the Aftermath of Exoneration, and Compensation for the Wrongly Convicted
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whether victims can ever be truly repaired by money, and whether any sum accurately reflects the gravity of the harms the wrongfully convicted experienced, has long been questioned.
“Whether victims can ever be truly repaired by money, and whether any sum accurately reflects the gravity of the harms the wrongfully convicted experienced, has long been questioned (Madrigal & Norris, 2022).”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Madrigal & Norris, 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Madrigal, A. J., & Norris, R. J.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Norris, Robert J.
- ORCID
- Norris, Robert J.
- Venue
- Critical Criminology
- Published
- 2022-07-25
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 895-913
- ISSN
- 0847-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1205-8629
- 1572-9877
- OpenAlex
- W4287092273
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- wrongful convictions, exoneration, compensation for wrongful conviction, uncertainty, criminal justice reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
