The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Manifold elastic net: a unified framework for sparse dimension reduction
Open accessAbstract
It is difficult to find the optimal sparse solution of a manifold learning based dimensionality reduction algorithm. The lasso or the elastic net penalized manifold learning based dimensionality reduction is not directly a lasso penalized least square problem and thus the least angle regression (LARS) (Efron et al., Ann Stat 32(2):407–499, 2004), one of the most popular algorithms in sparse learning, cannot be applied. Therefore, most current approaches take indirect ways or have strict settings, which can be inconvenient for applications. In this paper, we proposed the manifold elastic net or MEN for short. MEN incorporates the merits of both the manifold learning based dimensionality reduction and the sparse learning based dimensionality reduction. By using a series of equivalent transformations, we show MEN is equivalent to the lasso penalized least square problem and thus LARS is adopted to obtain the optimal sparse solution of MEN. In particular, MEN has the following advantages for subsequent classification: (1) the local geometry of samples is well preserved for low dimensional data representation, (2) both the margin maximization and the classification error minimization are considered for sparse projection calculation, (3) the projection matrix of MEN improves the parsimony in computation, (4) the elastic net penalty reduces the over-fitting problem, and (5) the projection matrix of MEN can be interpreted psychologically and physiologically. Experimental evidence on face recognition over various popular datasets suggests that MEN is superior to top level dimensionality reduction algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Sparse Principal Component Analysis
Zou, H., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2006) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186006x113430 · Cited by 3,152
Cited by
Single Image Super-Resolution With Non-Local Means and Steering Kernel Regression
Zhang, K., Gao, X., Tao, D., & Li, X. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2208977 · Cited by 576
Self-citationZhang, Y., Du, B., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2479299 · Cited by 485
On Combining Multiple Features for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification
Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Tao, D., & Huang, X. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2011.2162339 · Cited by 400
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, T., Tao, D., & Wu, X.
- Venue
- Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Published
- 2010-07-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 340-371
- ISSN
- 1384-5810 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-756X
- OpenAlex
- W2112737239
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 42.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manifold elastic net: a unified framework for sparse dimension reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10618-010-0182-x
- The paper
- Zhou, T., Tao, D., & Wu, X. (2011). Manifold elastic net: a unified framework for sparse dimension reduction. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-010-0182-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.