Cited by 25Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and Health

Bifidobacterial Diversity Determined by Culturing and by 16S rDNA Sequence Analysis in Feces and Mucosa from Ten Healthy Spanish Adults

Delgado, Susana, Suárez, Adolfo, Mayo, Baltasar·2006·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the numerically predominant bifidobacterial species in feces and mucosa of healthy Spanish people and to determine their phenotypic and genetic diversity. To this end, both traditional culturing and molecular methods were used. A set of 196 bifidobacterial colonies was identified from the counting plates by sequencing of a stretch of their 16S rRNA gene. Representative isolates were phenotypically characterized by their carbohydrate fermentation profile and genotypically typed by RAPD-PCR. Four 16S rDNA libraries composed of 113 clones from two fecal and two mucosal samples were independently analyzed. Seven bifidobacterial species were identified by culturing, and six by 16S rDNA analysis. Both methodologies showed Bifidobacterium longum and B. pseudocatenulatum to predominate in feces and mucosa, although high interindividual variability was noted. High phenotypic variation was observed in the fermentation profile of different isolates from the same species. RAPD analysis showed that two to five strains made up the subjects' personal bifidobacterial communities. The identification of the dominant bifidobacterial species could be useful for the rational design, use, and evaluation of probiotics in our community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10620-006-9293-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bifidobacteria are members of the intestinal microbiota of mammals and other animals.

    “Bifidobacteria are members of the intestinal microbiota of mammals and other animals, and some strains are able to exert health-promoting effects.”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Bifidobacteria are among the dominant bacterial populations in the gastrointestinal tract of humans.

    “Bifidobacteria are among the dominant bacterial populations in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of humans.”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [5]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 25

Authors
Delgado, S., Suárez, A., & Mayo, B.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes (ES)
Corresponding author
Mayo, Baltasar
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2006-09-12
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
1878-1885
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W2094617233
Cited by
25
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Bifidobacterium, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, fecal microbiota, intestinal mucosa, 16S rRNA gene, RAPD genotyping, interindividual variability, probiotics, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Bifidobacterium, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Feces, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Reference Values, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Spain, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Colon, Descending, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review