Effect of Synbiotics in Reducing the Systemic Inflammatory Response and Septic Complications in Moderately Severe and Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Parallel-Arm Double-Blind Randomized Trial
Abstract
Aim This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of synbiotics in reducing septic complications in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis.Methods This was a prospective, parallel-arm, double-blinded superiority randomized control study. All patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis were included in the study. Acute on chronic pancreatitis, pancreatitis due to trauma, ERCP and malignancy were excluded. 1 g of synbiotic containing both pre- and probiotics was administered to the cases twice a day for 14 days and a similar-looking placebo to controls. Patients were followed for 90 days. Primary outcomes were reduction of septic complications and inflammatory marker levels. Secondary outcomes were mortality, non-septic morbidity, length of hospitalization (LOH) and need for intervention.Results A total of 86 patients were randomized to 43 in each arm. Demographic profile and severity of pancreatitis were comparable. There was no significant difference in septic complications between the groups (59% vs. 64%; p 0.59). Total leucocyte and neutrophil counts showed a significant reduction in the first 7 days (p = 0.01 and 0.05). No significant difference was seen in other inflammatory markers. There was a significant reduction in the LOH (10 vs. 7; p = 0.02). Non-septic morbidity (41% vs. 62.2%; p 0.06) and length of ICU stay (3 vs. 2; p 0.06) had a trend towards significance. The need for intervention and mortality was comparable.Conclusion Synbiotics did not significantly reduce the septic complications in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis; however, they significantly reduced the LOH. There was no reduction in mortality and need for intervention. Clinical Trials Registry of India Number: CTRI/2018/03/012597.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Probiotic treatment in AP patients remains debated because both bacterial strains and dosing remain undetermined.
“Probiotic treatment in AP patients remains debated since both bacterial strains and dosing remain undetermined (Rohith et al. 2023).”
From Odoribacter laneus protects intestinal barrier by bile acid-FXR axis in acute pancreatitis (2026) · cites this paper as Rohith et al. 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Rohith, G., Sureshkumar, S., Anandhi, A., Kate, V., Rajesh, B. S., Abdulbasith, K. M., Nanda, N., Palanivel, C., & Vijayakumar, C.
- Affiliations
- Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sureshkumar, Sathasivam
- ORCID
- Venue
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Published
- 2022-07-20
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 969-977
- ISSN
- 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2568
- OpenAlex
- W4285993086
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIP/IEC/2015/20/713)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- synbiotics, acute pancreatitis, septic complications, systemic inflammatory response, prebiotics, probiotics, length of hospital stay, inflammatory markers, mortality
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Pancreatitis, Prospective Studies, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Synbiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review