Cited by 18Coding theory and cryptographyCryptography and Residue ArithmeticPolynomial and algebraic computation

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the dimension and structure of the square of the dual of a Goppa code

Open access
Mora, Rocco, Tillich, Jean-Pierre·2023·Designs, Codes and Cryptography

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10623-022-01153-w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the fourth round, there has been significant progress in cryptanalysis techniques applicable to key recovery and to distinguishing a Goppa code from a random linear code.

    “During the fourth round, there has been significant progress in cryptanalysis techniques that are applicable to key recovery and the related problem of distinguishing a Goppa code from a random linear code [46, 66-69].”

    From Status report on the fourth round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction (pp. 1–2) and Conclusion (p. 16) document progress on distinguishing high-rate Goppa codes from random codes. But the Conclusion says turning this distinguisher into a Goppa-code key-recovery attack remains a hope, not an achieved result. The cited passages also do not place the progress specifically during the fourth round. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Algebraic attacks targeting the structure of Goppa codes that achieve either key recovery or a distinguisher from a random linear code have remained an active area of research.

    “Nonetheless, algebraic attacks that target the structure of Goppa codes and achieve either key recovery or a distinguisher from a random linear code have remained an active area of research [46, 65-69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Becker A., Joux A., May A., Meurer A.: Decoding random binary linear codes in $$2^{n/20}$$: how $$1+1=0$$ improves information set decoding. In: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2012, LNCS. Springer (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Both L., May A.: Optimizing BJMM with nearest neighbors: full decoding in $$2^{2/21 n}$$ and McEliece security. In: WCC Workshop on Coding and Cryptography, September 2017. On Line Proceedings. http://wcc2017.suai.ru/Proceedings_WCC2017.zip
  3. Canteaut A., Chabaud F.: A new algorithm for finding minimum-weight words in a linear code: application to McEliece’s cryptosystem and to narrow-sense BCH codes of length 511. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 44(1), 367–378 (1998). · DOI
  4. Cascudo I., Cramer R., Mirandola D., Zémor G.: Squares of random linear codes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 61(3), 1159–1173 (2015). · DOI
  5. Courtois N., Finiasz M., Sendrier N.: How to achieve a McEliece-based digital signature scheme. In: Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2001, Volume 2248 of LNCS, Gold Coast, Australia, pp. 157–174. Springer (2001) · DOI
  6. Couvreur A., Gaborit P., Gauthier-Umaña V., Otmani A., Tillich J.-P.: Distinguisher-based attacks on public-key cryptosystems using Reed–Solomon codes. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 2, 641–666 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Couvreur A., Otmani A., Tillich J.-P.: Polynomial time attack on wild McEliece over quadratic extensions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 63(1), 404–427 (2017). · DOI
  8. Delsarte P.: On subfield subcodes of modified Reed–Solomon codes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 21(5), 575–576 (1975). · DOI
  9. Faugère J.-C., Gauthier V., Otmani A., Perret L., Tillich J.-P.: A distinguisher for high rate McEliece cryptosystems. In: Proc. IEEE Inf. Theory Workshop—ITW 2011, Paraty, Brazil, pp. 282–286 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Faugère J.-C., Gauthier V., Otmani A., Perret L., Tillich J.-P.: A distinguisher for high rate McEliece cryptosystems. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 59(10), 6830–6844 (2013). · DOI
  11. Kachigar G., Tillich J.-P.: Quantum information set decoding algorithms. In: Post-quantum Cryptography 2017, Volume 10346 of LNCS, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 69–89. Springer (2017) · DOI
  12. Lee P.J., Brickell E.F.: An observation on the security of McEliece’s public-key cryptosystem. In: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT’88, Volume 330 of LNCS, pp. 275–280. Springer (1988) · DOI
  13. MacWilliams F.J., Sloane N.J.A.: The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes, 5th edn North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986).
  14. Márquez-Corbella I., Pellikaan R.: Error-correcting pairs for a public-key cryptosystem. CBC 2012, code-based cryptography workshop, 2012. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 63(1), 404–427 (2017). · DOI
  15. May A., Ozerov I.: On computing nearest neighbors with applications to decoding of binary linear codes. In: Oswald E., Fischlin M. (eds.) Advances in Cryptology—-EUROCRYPT 2015, Volume 9056 of LNCS, pp. 203–228. Springer (2015) · DOI
  16. May A., Meurer A., Thomae E.: Decoding random linear codes in $$O(2^{0.054n})$$. In: Lee D.H., Wang X. (eds.) Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2011, Volume 7073 of LNCS, pp. 107–124. Springer (2011) · DOI
  17. McEliece R.J.: A Public-Key System Based on Algebraic Coding Theory. DSN Progress Report 44, pp. 114–116. Jet Propulsion Lab (1978)
  18. Patterson N.: The algebraic decoding of Goppa codes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 21(2), 203–207 (1975). · DOI
  19. Randriambololona H.: Asymptotically good binary linear codes with asymptotically good self-intersection spans. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 59(5), 3038–3045 (2013). · DOI
  20. Randriambololona H.: On products and powers of linear codes under componentwise multiplication. In: Algorithmic Arithmetic, Geometry, and Coding Theory, Volume 637 of Contemp. Math., pp. 3–78. American Mathematics Society, Providence (2015) · DOI
  21. Sendrier N.: On the use of structured codes in code based cryptography. In: Storme L., Nikova S., Preneel B. (eds.) Coding Theory and Cryptography III, pp. 59–68. The Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts, Bruxelles (2010).
  22. Wieschebrink C.: Cryptanalysis of the Niederreiter public key scheme based on GRS subcodes. In: Post-quantum Cryptography 2010, Volume 6061 of LNCS, pp. 61–72. Springer (2010) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mora, R., & Tillich, J.-P.
Affiliations
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Mora, Rocco
Venue
Designs, Codes and Cryptography
Published
2022-11-22
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
1351-1372
ISSN
  • 0925-1022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7586
OpenAlex
W3215246204
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Designs Codes and Cryptography (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE39-0007, ANR-21-CE39-0009)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Polynomial and algebraic computation
Keywords
Goppa codes, alternant codes, dual codes, dimension bounds, TRACE code, non-binary codes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review