CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Export quality: the historical bloc, state of exception, and the hegemonic process in the avocado enclave of Michoacán

Román-Burgos, Denisse, Macip-Ríos, Ricardo F.·2022·Dialectical Anthropology
DOI 10.1007/s10624-022-09662-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10624-022-09662-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Álvarez, I. 2021. The Moral Economy of Drug Trafficking: Armed Civilians and Mexico’s Violence and Crime. Latin American Perspectives 48 (1): 231–244. · DOI
  2. Althusser, L. 2014. On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. New York: Verso.
  3. Atuesta, L., and A. Ponce. 2017. Meet the Narco: Increased Competition Among Criminal Organisations and the Explosion of Violence in Mexico. Global Crime 18 (4): 375–402. · DOI
  4. Boyer, C. 2015. Political Landscapes. Forests, Conservation and Community in Mexico. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  5. Cadeddu, D. 2020. A Companion to Antonio Gramsci. Essays on History and Theories of History, Politics and Historigraphy. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  6. Cardoso, F.H., and E. Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: The University of California Press. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Crehan, K. 2002. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
  8. Crehan, Kate. 2016. Gramsci’s Common Sense: Inequality and its Narratives. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Curry, Alexander. 2019. Autodefensas and the Construction of Citizenship and State-Society Relations in Mexico. Doctoral thesis, University of London. London: United Kingdom.
  10. Filippini, Michele. 2017. Using Gramsci. A new approach. Translated by Patrick J. Barr. London: Pluto Press. · DOI
  11. Garyson, G. 2010. La Familia Michoacana Drug Cartel: Implications for U.S.-Mexican Security. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute. · DOI
  12. Gil, J. 2015. Batallas de Michoacán. Autodefensas, el proyecto colombiano de Peña Nieto. Mexico City: Ediciones Proceso.
  13. Gramsci, A. 1995. The Southern Question. Boca Raton: Bordighera Press.
  14. Guerra, Enrique. 2015. Las autodefensas en Michoacán. Movimiento social, paramilitarismo y neocaciquismo. Política y Cultura 44: 7–31.
  15. Guerra, Edgar. 2018. Organización armada. El proceso de toma de decisiones de los grupos de autodefensa tepalcatepenses. Estudios Sociológicos 36 (106): 99–123. · DOI
  16. Hernández, Daniel. 1995. Estrategias de acción política de los empresarios uruapenses. Revista Relaciones 61–62: 81–105.
  17. Herrera, Eunice. 2017. “Oro verde a la sombra del volcán”. La agroindustria trasnacional del aguacate y las transformaciones en la tenencia de la tierra en la sierra p’urhépecha. Doctoral Thesis, El Colegio de Michoacán. Zamora: Mexico.
  18. Hetherington, Kregg. 2019. The Government of Beans. Regulating Life in the Age of Monocrops. Durham: Duke University Press.
  19. Le Cour Grandmaison, Romain. 2016. ‘Vigilar y Limpiar’. Identification and Self-Help Justice Making in Michoacán, México. Politix 3 (115): 103–125. · DOI
  20. Macip, R.F. 2005. Semos un país de peones: Café, crisis y el estado neoliberal en el centro de Veracruz. Puebla: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
  21. Maldonado, Salvador. 2012. Drogas, violencia y militarización. El caso de Michoacán. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 74(1): 5–39.
  22. Mallon, Florencia. 1994. Reflections on the Ruins: Everyday Forms of State Formation in Nineteenth Century Mexico. In Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico, ed. Gilbert M Joseph and Daniel Nugent, 69–106. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  23. Mendoza, J.M. 1995. Estado producción y comercio de aguacate en el área productora de Uruapan 1960–1993. Michoacán: Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia.
  24. Mintz, S. 1985. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Penguin.
  25. Mintz, S. 1998. The Localization of Anthropological Practice. Critique of Anthropology 18 (2): 117–133. · DOI
  26. Moloeznik, M.P., S. de Garay, and M. Eugenia. 2012. El proceso de militarización de la seguridad pública en México (2006–2010). Frontera Norte 24 (48): 121–144.
  27. Pansters, W. 2015. We Had to Pay to Live! Competing Sovereignties in Violent Mexico. Conflict and Society 1: 144–164. · DOI
  28. Raynolds, Laura (2003) The Global Banana Trade in Banana Wars, ed. Steve Striffler and Mark Moberg, 23–47, Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  29. Roseberry, William. 1994. Hegemony and the Language of Contention. In Everyday of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico, ed. Gilbert M Joseph and Daniel Nugent, 355–366. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  30. Roseberry, W. 1996. The Rise of Yuppie Coffees and the Reimagination of Class in the United States. American Anthropologist 98 (4): 762–775. · DOI
  31. Roseberry, W. 2002. Understanding Capitalism—Historically, Structurally, Spatially. In Locating Capitalism in Time and Space: Global Restructurings, Politics, and Identity, ed. David Nugent, 61–79. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  32. Schivelbusch, W. 1992. Tastes of Paradise: A Social History of Spices, Stimulants, and Intoxicants. New York: Vintage.
  33. Sider, G. 2003. Between History and Tomorrow: Making and Breaking Everyday Life in Rural Newfoundland. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
  34. Smith, G. 1999. Confronting the Present. Oxford: Berg.
  35. Smith, G. 2004. Hegemony: Critical Interpretations in Anthropology and Beyond. Focaal-European Journal of Anthropology 43: 99–120.
  36. Smith, G. 2014. Intellectuals and (Counter-) Politics. Oxford: Berghahn. · DOI
  37. Stanford, L. 2002. Constructing ‘Quality’: The Political Economy of Standards in Mexico’s Avocado Industry. Agriculture and Human Values 19: 293–310. · DOI
  38. Stanford, L., and J.A. Hogeland. 2004. Designing Organizations for a Globalized World: CALAVO’S Transition from Cooperative to Corporation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (5): 1269–1275. · DOI
  39. Striffler, S., and M. Moberg. 2003. Banana Wars. Power, Production, and History in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  40. Taussig, M. 2018. Palma Africana. Chicago: Chicago University Press. · DOI
  41. Tinajero, Margarita. 2003. Impacto de la NOM-FITO-1995 en las empresas empacadoras de aguacate de la ciudad de Uruapan, Michoacán. Bachelor Thesis, Universidad Don Vasco, A.C, Uruapan: Michoacán.
  42. Thomas, P.D. 2010. The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  43. Treviño-Rangel, J. 2018. Silencing Grievance: Responding to Human Rights Violations in Mexico’s War on Drugs. Journal of Human Rights 17: 485–501. · DOI
  44. West, P. 2012. From Modern Production to Imagined Primitive: The Social World of Coffee from Papua New Guinea. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  45. Zhang, Jinghong. 2013. Puer Tea. Ancient Canvas and Urban Chic. Washington: The University of Washington Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Román-Burgos, D., & Macip-Ríos, R. F.
Venue
Dialectical Anthropology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-06
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
225-246
ISSN
  • 0304-4092
  • 1573-0786
DOI
10.1007/s10624-022-09662-9
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • economic and social research council (ES/P006167/1)
  • British Academy (NIF23\100188)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Export quality: the historical bloc, state of exception, and the hegemonic process in the avocado enclave of Michoacán. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10624-022-09662-9
The paper
Román-Burgos, D., & Macip-Ríos, R. F. (2022). Export quality: the historical bloc, state of exception, and the hegemonic process in the avocado enclave of Michoacán. Dialectical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-022-09662-9