The DOI matches its Crossref record.
About Mexican formations: selective hegemony under neoliberal multiculturalism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“At the same time, these power-laden relational practices create a certain common sense (Macip-Ríos and Román-Burgos 2022).”
From Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe (2022) · cites this paper as Macip-Ríos and Román-Burgos 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Asad, Talal. 1995. Genealogies of Religion. Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Geertz, Clifford. 1987. [1973] La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa.
- Joseph, Gilbert, and Daniel Nugent, eds. 1994. Everyday Forms of State Formation. Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Roseberry, William. 1989. Anthropologies and Histories. Essays in Culture, History and Political Economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
- Roseberry, William 1994 Hegemony and the Language of Contention IN Gilbert M. Joseph and Daniel Nugent (EDS) Everyday Forms of State Formation. Revolution and the Ngotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico. Duke University Press, Durham. · DOI
- Scott, David. 2014. Omens of Adversity. Tragedy, Time, Memory, Justice. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
- Shah, Alpa. 2010. In the Shadows of the State. Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism, and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
- Smith, Gavin. 1999. Confronting the Present. Towards a Politically Engaged Anthropology. New York: Berg.
- Wolf, Eric. 1959. Sons of the Shaking Earth. The People of Mexico and Guatemala—Their Land, History and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe
Streinzer, A., & Tosic, J. (2022) · Dialectical Anthropology · doi:10.1007/s10624-022-09679-0 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Macip-Ríos, R. F., & Román-Burgos, D.
- Venue
- Dialectical Anthropology
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-121
- ISSN
- 0304-4092
- 1573-0786
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
