The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 64 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Why Gramsci?
Open accessOverview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Kate Crehan argues that Gramsci's prison notebooks remain a vital resource for twenty-first-century analysis precisely because his Marxism is open, undogmatic, and insistent that abstract concepts like "the State" and "common sense" must be mapped onto concrete historical realities rather than imposed as templates. She illustrates this through the ethnographic contributions to the special issue she introduces, covering statelessness, church charity in Portugal and Italy, immigration in Vienna, Covid conspiracy theories in Carinthia, and far-right appropriations of Gramsci.
Key findings
- Gramsci's shifting definitions of "the State" — from the expansive "entire complex of practical and theoretical activities with which the ruling class not only justifies and maintains its dominance, but manages to win the active consent of those over whom it rules" (1971: 244) to the narrow "governmental-coercive apparatus" distinguished from "civil society" (1971: 265) — are not contradictions but a deliberate refusal to let theory dictate to empirical reality.
- Crehan argues the far right's appropriation of Gramsci (e.g., Alain de Benoist as "the key far-right 'importer' of Gramsci"; Rush Limbaugh's 1994 *See, I Told You So*) is not a threat, since "no theorist can control the meanings others attribute to their writings," and Gramsci himself held that what matters is "the ensemble of opinions that have become collective and a powerful factor in society" (2007: 347).
- Gramsci's "common sense" (*senso comune*) is a "chaotic aggregate of disparate conceptions" (1971: 422) containing both a "healthy nucleus" of "good sense [buon senso]" (1971: 328) and dross; Crehan stresses its neutrality, citing Lems's Carinthian fieldwork where villagers' "healthy human wit" (gesunder Menschenverstand) underpinned Covid conspiracy theories rooted in a culture of opposition traceable to the sixteenth century.
- Karasz's Vienna fieldwork (Monte Laa, 2011 and 2018) traced a shift in common-sense belonging from "Austrians" vs. "non-Austrians" to "Muslim" vs. "non-Muslim," following nearly 90,000 asylum applications in Austria in 2015 and more than 42,000 the next year.
Methods
- This is a conceptual/theoretical essay introducing a special issue of *Dialectical Anthropology*; it presents no original empirical data of its own.
- It synthesizes and interprets the special issue's ethnographic contributions — Beyer on statelessness activists, Pusceddu and Alves de Matos on Church charity in Setúbal (Portugal) and Brindisi (Italy, fieldwork 2015–2016), Karasz on Vienna, Lems on an Austrian Alpine village (summer 2020), and Pasieka on far-right organisations Lealtà Azione (Italy) and Praca Polska (Poland) — alongside close reading of Gramsci's notebooks and letters to Tatiana Schucht.
- Analysis proceeds by juxtaposing Gramscian concepts (State, civil society, common sense, good sense, philosophy of praxis, hegemony) against the ethnographic cases to argue for context-specific mapping over abstract definition.
Limitations
- The paper states no limitations of its own; it is an interpretive introduction rather than a study with a bounded sample or method.
- Evident from the text: the argument rests on Crehan's own reading of the notebooks and on secondhand summaries of the special issue's articles, so the ethnographic evidence is reported rather than independently analyzed; the claim that Gramsci "seems to me an exemplary guide" is explicitly framed as her personal reading, and she acknowledges the notebooks are "not an easy read" and that their author's basic Marxist assumptions are left unstated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
59 Sources not found · 56 Own interpretation · 9 No basis given · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet
In the paper
“The majority of the volunteers carrying out the actual work of delivering the ‘charity’ studied by Alves de Matos were women.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Alves de Matos
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it was the lived experience of these masses of workers that would provide the foundation for necessary political narratives”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those performing such ‘charity’ work, especially when it is unpaid, tend to be women.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Alongside the de jure stateless, there are also the far more numerous de facto stateless.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Beyer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This self-perception was a deeply rooted strand of the villagers’ common sense.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lems’ study of responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in a very different region of Austria, throws light on the way longer histories can shape local common sense.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“we cannot simply force the world in all its unpredictability into our ready-prepared, theoretical boxes”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1996: 52
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the fundamental motive power for progressive social transformation lay with industrial workers concentrated in massive factories”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Within this confusion progressives should seek out, ‘the beginnings of a new world, rough and jagged though they always are’ (Gramsci, 1971: 343). These beginnings, he argued, emerged from the realities of the lives of the oppressed, and represented the seeds from which new and powerful oppositional narratives develop.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“When Karasz returned to Monte Laa in 2018, she found the shared understanding of who ‘belonged’ and who did not, had shifted from ‘one between “Austrians” and “non-Austrians” to one between “Muslim” and “non-Muslim”’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Karasz
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 95
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The boundaries between State, family and Church are entrenched and long-standing, but also shifting and fuzzy.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In her contribution to this special issue, Pasieka explores both what she calls ‘far-right Gramscianism’, that is, Gramsci’s impact on far-right milieus, and how Gramsci’s thought might help us understand this phenomenon.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pasieka
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Conducting fieldwork in the midst of a pandemic was made particularly difficult by what seemed to be the local population’s refusal to take the pandemic seriously, a scepticism that was not confined to the less educated.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“He termed such jagged beginnings ‘the healthy nucleus’ within common sense, the element that ‘can be called “good sense [buon senso]” and which deserves to be made more unitary and coherent’. (Gramsci, 1971: 328).”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“It is also never a coherent whole, always a conglomeration of different, often disparate elements, a conglomeration that represents ‘a relatively rigid phase of popular knowledge at a given time and place’, as Gramsci puts it in one note (Gramsci. 1971: 326).”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“he is not suggesting that he is aiming for a God-like view, remote from the messy world of political reality in which he had been immersed as a political activist, but rather that he will be seeking to go beyond the surface flux.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of the reasons the notebooks retain their relevance is the help they can give us in understanding the nature of the ‘cultural front’ on which we must struggle.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This history resonates with Anton’s insistence that the Austrian government and global elites had fabricated their Covid narrative to ruin small businesses and replace Austrian workers with cheap foreign labour.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Importantly, common sense for Gramsci is never outside history.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“But American far-right pundits, too, sometimes claim Gramsci. Rush Limbaugh in his 1994 See, I told You So, explicitly draws on Gramsci, although in a way that would seem to have little to do with what we find in the notebooks.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Limbaugh, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gramsci’s intellectual project in the notebook, like that of Machiavelli, can be seen as a mass of interwoven threads. Depending on their understanding of the ‘realities’ they confront, different political actors will draw out different strands, weaving them together in a way that reflects their view of the world.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The neutrality of Gramsci’s concept of ‘common sense’, I would argue, is precisely what makes it such a useful concept.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“he ‘would like to concentrate intensely and systematically on some subject’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1994a: 83
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The concept of common sense in the notebooks names a crucial, but protean terrain that exists in all societies.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a lot of dross, however, surrounding this ‘healthy nucleus’, which is just as much the product of experience and history as is ‘good sense’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is precisely Gramsci’s lack of precision, the flexibility and openness of his Marxism that gives it its life and its continued relevance.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ‘truths’ of common sense are embedded in that daily life — because common sense is so taken-for-granted, it lurks in the form of assumptions that do not need to be put into words.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“this journalism ‘written for the day’, focussing on the specific issues of that moment, needed to be distinguished from more substantial intellectual analysis that sought to trace out the structural forces that lay beneath the ever-shifting surface of day-to-day reality.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1994b: 66
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Judith Beyer’s account of expert activists working in behalf of stateless people, for instance, demonstrates the real world messiness of ‘statelessness’, and the importance of tracing out exactly what ‘the State’ is in a given context.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Beyer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while the serious intellectual work Gramsci is proposing may not be of immediate use to activists, such in-depth analysis is essential as the basis of any effective challenge to the existing hegemony.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, Gramsci’s thought is underpinned by basic Marxist assumptions that he does not think it necessary to state explicitly.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Gramsci lists the ‘principal assertions made in the encyclicals of the more recent popes’”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1992: 100
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Running through the notebooks, there is (as Gramsci argued there is in Marx’s writings),an assertion of the necessity for new popular beliefs, that is to say a new common sense and with it a new culture and a new philosophy which will be rooted in the popular consciousness with the same solidity and imperative quality as traditional beliefs.(Gramsci, 1971: 424)”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the contributions to this special issue demonstrate, the discipline’s stress on attentive listening, and a readiness to have preconceptions challenged, makes anthropologists particularly well suited to tracing out the empirical realities into which large abstractions, such as ‘the State’ or ‘common sense’ manifest themselves in a given context.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“She describes how her experiences in her home village challenged some of her preconceptions”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“And this tension would reoccur, ‘leading to self-depictions of the mountain villagers as proud and independent bearers of healthy human wit and fierce opponents to the changes imposed upon them by liberal city elites.’”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Antonio Maria Pusceddu and Patricia Alves de Matos’s case studies explore how in each country the obligation of ‘Christian charity’ can be seen as applying band-aids to some of the gaping wounds produced by the austerity policies imposed by the EU.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pusceddu and Alves de Matos
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gramsci can help us think through how political movements transform the raw, fragmented knowledge that emerges from lived experience into narratives with the power to overcome the entrenched, and seemingly immoveable, assumptions undergirding the existing hegemony.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Catholic Church, we might say, sees itself here as buttressing the State; its role, the alleviation of the poverty and suffering of individuals, not social transformation.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tradition of ethnographic fieldwork, so central to anthropology as a discipline, helps to equip anthropologists for this task.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“a narrative, as Pusceddu and Alves de Matos note, that resonated with ‘a nationwide myth about migrants and refugees receiving privileged treatment while “Italians are starving”.’”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pusceddu and Alves de Matos
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“they compare Church-run charity organisations in two impoverished regions, one in Setúbal, Portugal and one in Brindisi Italy.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pusceddu and Alves de Matos
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“References to his concepts crop up in popular media as well as scholarly publications.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the conception of a subaltern social group, deprived of historical initiative, in continuous but disorganic expansion, unable to go beyond a certain qualitative level”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971: 396
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the notebooks, ‘common sense’ (senso comune) gathers together all those received opinions that people see as ‘obvious’, beyond question to any ‘sensible’ person.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the definitions he does give in the notebooks continually shift depending on the specific context”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gramsci’s insistence that we pay attention to all ‘the elements of historical life’, however ‘bizarre’ these may be, and however much they may challenge our pre-existing theoretical schema, can also help us think through the recurrent tension between ‘theorists’ and ‘activists’”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“I would like to fully develop in depth the thesis that I sketched out then, from a “disinterested”, “ für ewig” point of view.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1994a: 83
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In France, for instance, there is Alain de Benoist, founder of GRECE (Groupement de Recherche et d'Études pour la Civilisation Européenne [Research and Study Group for European Civilization]), whom Agnieszka Pasieka describes as ‘the key far-right “importer” of Gramsci’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pasieka
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A key reason the writings of this Sardinian Marxist can speak to our historical moment is the resolutely undogmatic nature of his thinking.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gramsci continues to be a presence in political debates across the world.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is not that theoreticians and activists are necessarily different people, but rather that the same individuals are positioned differently in different contexts.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Gramsci by contrast, questions whether ‘a philosophical movement [is] properly so called when it is devoted to creating a specialized culture among restricted intellectual groups.’ (Gramsci, 1971: 330).”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To understand the Austrian villagers’ ‘healthy human wit’ — so much of it distinctly unhealthy in the context of a pandemic — Lems realised she needed to ‘look at the historical embeddedness of the common sense ideas’ confronting her.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Antonio Maria Pusceddu and Patricia Alves de Matos’s fieldwork provides another example of the usefulness of Gramsci’s insistence that we always need to examine the concrete ways actual States in actual places manifest themselves.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pusceddu and Alves de Matos
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She draws on her fieldwork with two far-right organisations: Lealtà Azione (Loyalty Action, LA) in Italy, and the much smaller Praca Polska (Polish Labour, PP) in Poland.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pasieka
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is essential that political narratives that have the power to challenge capitalist regimes are firmly rooted in the lived experience of subalternity.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following the approach we find in the notebooks makes it less likely that we will continue forcing new realities into old theoretical boxes.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“the research in my home village confronted me with the irrefutable fact that everyday conceptions of the world are far more complex.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Scott, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This ability to shape shift is in fact one of the defining characteristics of ‘great’ thinkers, those whose theories remain living bodies of thought even when the historical moment that produced them has long passed.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Her article also demonstrates the different connotations ‘common sense’ has in different language traditions.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“the State is the entire complex of practical and theoretical activities with which the ruling class not only justifies and maintains its dominance, but manages to win the active consent of those over whom it rules”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971: 244
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This kind of engagement with the notebooks is time-consuming, and outside the world of Gramsci scholars, even among academics there are not so many willing to take it on.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a person who is not considered as a national by any State under the operation of its law”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Beyer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Gramsci of those who know Marx only as a bogey man whose theories led directly to Stalin and the gulag, and whose knowledge of the notebooks comes from predigested soundbites, has little to do with the thinker we encounter when we engage with the notebooks in a serious and focussed way.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If we think about ‘the State’ is this way, the distinction between ‘the State’ and the ‘third sector’ begins to look more like a conjuror’s slight of hand than an objective reality.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Lems glosses ‘healthy human wit’ as ‘a sober, practical and realistic kind of knowledge that has grown out of life experience’, a definition that aligns more closely with the English ‘common sense’ (the normal English translation of Gramsci’s senso comune) with its strong positive connotations, than with the more neutral Italian term.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Danielle Karasz and Angelica Lems’ articles illustrate the usefulness of Gramsci’s concept of common sense for those attempting to map the fractious politics of immigration (Karasz), and their intertwining with conspiracy theories around Covid-19 (Lems) in the case of Austria.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Karasz
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lems
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Continually shape shifting, it cannot be defined in the abstract beyond its shared acceptance among a given collectivity and its apparent obviousness; if it needs to be substantiated with evidence, it is not common sense.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is instructive here to compare him with Foucault, who towards the end of his life, his biographer tells us, worried that his books were travelling too far beyond the scholarly ghetto: ‘[T]oo wide a circulation for scholarly books was disastrous for their reception’, Foucault insisted, ‘because it bought with it a multitude of misunderstandings.’ (Eribon 1991, 292).”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eribon 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once ideas are out in the world, how they are understood depends on where, and when, and by whom, they are picked up.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He identifies terrains we need to explore, while leaving those terrains undefined enough so they can encompass new twenty-first century realities the Sardinian Marxist did not live to see.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the 1930s, Carinthia was one of the most important Nazi strongholds.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather surprisingly, and worryingly for some on the left, he is also invoked by those on the right.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is never, as it was for Hannah Arendt, ‘that portion of inherited wisdom which all men have in common in any given civilization’”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Arendt, 1994: 317
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such shifting definitions should not be seen as Gramsci contradicting himself, but rather the result of his insistence that we should use theory to help us make sense of ever-shifting empirical realities, not as a rigid template to which those realities are expected to conform.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“common sense in the notebooks is always a heterogeneous, often contradictory, mass of received opinions, the elements of which are continually being added to, modified, falling away, as they move through history.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the same time, these conspiracy theories provided him with a simple, straightforward explanation as to why, through no fault of his own, he and other small business owners were suffering.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For good or ill, precisely because Gramsci’s Marxism is so open, the different strands that make up the notebooks can be rewoven in a multitude of ways.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No theorist can control the meanings others attribute to their writings.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“For him, the ideas that are important are those that act in the world: ‘What matters is not the opinion of Tom, Dick, and Harry but the ensemble of opinions that have become collective and a powerful factor in society.’ (Gramsci, 2007: 347).”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“‘Machiavelli’s thought has been appropriated throughout the course of Italian history precisely by those elements and groups that have been the strongest and most consistent opponents of the Machiavellian political project.’ (Fontana, 1993: 70).”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fontana, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That abstract theoretical schema do not provide such templates is, for me, one of the most valuable lessons we can learn from the prison notebooks: it is up to us as analysts to do the work of mapping those details as they exist in a given historical moment.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once out in the world, ideas take on a life of their own.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But this is a starting, not an endpoint. Running through the notebooks are the questions: how exactly has the particular ‘social existence’ of any given time and place ‘determined’ consciousness? What does ‘determine’ mean in practice?”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once we go beyond a monolithic notion of the State and focus on the particular ways in which particular States interact with their populations, two inescapable institutions are the family and the Church.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the state delegating its responsibilities to the third sector while reinforcing a broader philosophy of charity and poor relief in welfare provisioning”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Alves de Matos and Pusceddu
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effective political theory can never be a pure ‘head-birth’ springing directly from the brains of intellectuals.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“the mass of the peasantry, although it performs an essential function in the world of production, does not elaborate its own “organic” intellectuals.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971: 6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A successful political movement needs both theoreticians and activists.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The notebooks are not an easy read, possessing, as Joseph Buttigieg puts it, ‘all the intricacies and perplexities of a textual labyrinth.’ (Gramsci, 1992: ix).”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Buttigieg
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This strong ethnic nationalism, the belief in an unbreakable link between a ‘people’ and its homeland runs through European, right-wing, nationalist discourse.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“be denied housing, medical care, school attendance, marriage, and even the freedom to move from one place to another”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Beyer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hovering over the notebooks is a chattering, albeit unseen, crowd of disputing interlocutors, with whom contemporary readers are unlikely to be familiar.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the same time, he is far from dismissive of common sense.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the same time, as I read the notebooks, their author accepts implicitly that no theorist can control how s/he is interpreted.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“both forms of expertise (to use Beyer’s term) are necessary and need to be in continual dialogue with one another.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recognising the connections between what can appear a rather random collection of reflections on very disparate subjects requires careful, and patient readers, willing to follow Gramsci down far from obvious paths, readers who are not looking for quick soundbites.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An added difficulty is that Gramsci is a profoundly dialogic thinker.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, in the notebooks, Gramsci lays out an approach to the mapping the complex and contradictory terrain of common sense, and how to think about the ‘good sense’ entangled with the dross.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such tensions around who has the ‘right’ to help, and what kind of ‘right’, are growing across the globe, and are likely to become more extreme as climate change produces, directly or indirectly, ever greater flows of climate refugees.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gramsci’s notion of common sense fits very well with this radical openness, giving anthropologists a way of thinking about this ever-shifting terrain that refuses to define common sense in the abstract except in the loosest terms, while providing enough structure so that we can make sense of it.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In more recent times, it was the ‘ideological bastion’ of the fiercely right-wing politician Jörg Haider, and the state has continued to support right-wing candidates.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Different states practise different forms of denial and exclusion, and enforce their boundaries with different degrees of harshness, all of which can change over time.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“distinguishes between ‘civil society’ and ‘the State in the narrow sense of the governmental-coercive apparatus’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Against abstraction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gramsci, 1971: 265
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The actual mapping of specific empirical terrains is up to us as analysts.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the USA, a country built on settler colonialism, and the displacement, or outright genocide of the indigenous population, the narratives of who is ‘really’ American with authentic claims to the rights of ‘an American’, are founded on somewhat different, if equally emotionally based claims of ‘belonging’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Appropriating Gramsci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And not only in Portugal does such caring work tend to be seen as a ‘natural’ extension of women’s ‘natural’ care-giving role within the family.”
§ Why Gramsci? > State, family, and church
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The notebooks do not furnish us with any magic formula that tells us how to create this ‘new common sense’ with its accompanying ‘new culture’ and ‘new philosophy’, what Stuart Hall called ‘a new cultural order’.”
§ Why Gramsci? > Engaging with Gramsci
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hall
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mapping the precise contours of this ‘popular knowledge’ requires the careful empirical investigation of daily life.”
§ Why Gramsci? > ‘Healthy Human Wit’
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Citations
Cites
Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance
(1986) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(86)90141-5 · Cited by 9,858
Thomas, P. (2009) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/ej.9789004167711.i-478 · Cited by 697
The antinomies of Antonio Gramsci
Anderson, P. (2017) · Cited by 342
Hegemony and power: on the relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4608 · Cited by 196
Gramsci's Common Sense: Inequality and Its Narratives
Crehan, K. (2016) · doi:10.1215/9780822373742 · Cited by 149
Self-citationThe Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony, and Marxism
Otruba, A. P. (2012) · Critique · doi:10.1080/00111619.2012.697769 · Cited by 36
The Hidden FrontierEcology and Ethnicity in an Alpine Valley
Cole, J., & Wolf, E. (1999) · doi:10.1525/california/9780520216815.001.0001 · Cited by 24
Of Horses and Water: On the Power of the Fragment
Crehan, K. (2022) · Italian Culture · doi:10.1080/01614622.2022.2060492 · Cited by 3
Self-citationThe Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci
Anderson, P. (1976) · New Left Review · doi:10.64590/lrz
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Arendt, Hannah. 1994. Understanding and Politics. In Hannah Arendt: Essays in Understanding 1930–1954, ed. Jerome Kohn, 307–327. New York: Hardcourt Brace.
- Eribon, Didier. 1991. Michel Foucault. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Gramsci, Antonio .1992. Antonio Gramsci: Prison Notebooks (Vol. I), edited and translated by Joseph A. Buttigieg. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Gramsci, Antonio .1994a. Letters from Prison. Vol. I Edited by Frank Rosengarten and translated by Ray Rosenthal. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Gramsci, Antonio .1994b. Letters from Prison. Vol. II Edited by Frank Rosengarten and translated by Ray Rosenthal. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Gramsci, Antonio .1996. Antonio Gramsci: Prison Notebooks (Vol. II), edited and translated by Joseph A. Buttigieg. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Gramsci, Antonio .2007. Antonio Gramsci: Prison Notebooks (Vol. III), edited and translated by Joseph A. Buttigieg. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
TRANSFORMATION OF LOCAL NORMS IN INHERITANCE DIVISION IN PANTURA: A SOCIOLOGY OF LAW APPROACH
Ngazizah, I. F. (2025) · Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law · doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol13no2.1124 · Cited by 5
Nagy, K. (2023) · Intersections · doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v9i4.1127 · Cited by 4
The Impact of Three Crises on the Hegemony of Finland's Nuclear Power Elite
Husu, H., Talala, R., & Kojo, M. (2025) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9477.70021 · Cited by 1
Babel Karya R, F Kuang dalam Pandangan Hegemoni Gramsci
Jayanti, N. F. D. (2026) · Protasis Jurnal Bahasa Sastra Budaya dan Pengajarannya · doi:10.55606/protasis.v5i1.263 · Cited by 1
dos Santos, J. F. E. (2023) · Ciência Cuidado e Saúde · doi:10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v22i0.61413
CULTURAL HEGEMONY IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF DOLALAK DANCE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS
Pradipta, P. P., & Kusnadi (2026) · MORFAI JOURNAL · doi:10.5281/zenodo.22661399
BANYU PANGURIPAN TRADITION: SACREDNESS IN AN ISLAMIC CONTECT
Ilafi, A., Sudardi, B., Subiyantoro, S., & Pitaña, T. S. (2024) · International Conference on Humanity Education and Society (ICHES)
Metadata
- Authors
- Crehan, K.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crehan, Kate
- Venue
- Dialectical anthropology
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 507-520
- ISSN
- 0304-4092 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0786
- PMC
- PMC9760528
- OpenAlex
- W4312195442
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Dialectical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political theory and Gramsci
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Philosophy and Social Theory
- Keywords
- Antonio Gramsci, Gramscian theory, Marxism, historical progress, cultural hegemony, power, Stuart Hall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
