A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of silybin-phytosome in prostate cancer patients
Abstract
Silibinin is a polyphenolic flavonoid isolated from milk thistle with anti-neoplastic activity in several in vitro and in vivo models of cancer, including prostate cancer. Silybin-phytosome is a commercially available formulation containing silibinin. This trial was designed to assess the toxicity of high-dose silybin-phytosome and recommend a phase II dose. Silybin-phytosome was administered orally to prostate cancer patients, giving 2.5-20 g daily, in three divided doses. Each course was 4 weeks in duration. Thirteen patients received a total of 91 courses of silybin-phytosome. Baseline patient characteristics included: median age of 70 years, median baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 4.3 ng/ml, and a median ECOG performance status of 0. The most prominent adverse event was hyperbilirubinemia, with grade 1-2 bilirubin elevations in 9 of the 13 patients. The only grade 3 toxicity observed was elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in one patient; no grade 4 toxicity was noted. No objective PSA responses were observed. We conclude that 13 g of oral silybin-phytosome daily, in 3 divided doses, appears to be well tolerated in patients with advanced prostate cancer and is the recommended phase II dose. Asymptomatic liver toxicity is the most commonly seen adverse event.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Silybin, a natural flavonoid and potent GLUT1/GLUT4 inhibitor, was effective in a phase 1 prostate cancer trial with asymptomatic liver toxicity.
“A promising candidate is silybin, a natural flavonoid and potent inhibitor of GLUT1 and GLUT4, which was shown to be effective in phase 1 trial of prostate cancer with asymptotic liver toxicity as an adverse effect48.”
From The metabolic landscape of RAS-driven cancers from biology to therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 315
- Authors
- Flaig, T. W., Gustafson, D. L., Su, L.-J., Zirrolli, J. A., Crighton, F., Harrison, G. S., Pierson, A. S., Agarwal, R., & Glodé, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- University of Colorado Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Investigational New Drugs
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-146
- ISSN
- 0167-6997 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0646
- OpenAlex
- W2039299190
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Investigational New Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA046934)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
- Keywords
- silibinin, prostate cancer, flavonoids, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, hyperbilirubinemia, hepatotoxicity, oral administration, advanced prostate cancer
- MeSH terms
- Silybin, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Excipients, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Liver Function Tests, Male, Phosphatidylcholines, Prostatic Neoplasms, Silymarin, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Glucuronides, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review