Cited by 517Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology and E-LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis

Castro, Mayleen Dorcas B., Tumibay, Gilbert M.·2021·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings of the present study are consistent with those of Castro and Tumibay [73] in terms of the interactive course content and feedback, but also highlight other good practices.

    “Moreover, the findings of the present study are consistent with those of Castro and Tumibay [73] in terms of the interactive course content and feedback, but also highlight other good practices, as mentioned above.”

    From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Castro and Tumibay [73]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M.
Affiliations
Angeles University Foundation (PH)
Corresponding author
  • Castro, Mayleen Dorcas B.
  • Tumibay, Gilbert M.
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2019-11-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
1367-1385
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W2986485696
Cited by
517
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 11
FWCI
91.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
online learning, online courses, higher education, ADDIE model, instructional design, online vs face-to-face learning, learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review