The effects of pre-service early childhood teachers’ digital literacy and self-efficacy on their perception of AI education for young children
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digitally literate teachers report enhanced self-efficacy.
“report enhanced self-efficacy (Lim, 2023)”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Lim, 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Lim, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Sungkyul University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, Eun Mee
- ORCID
- Lim, Eun Mee
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2023-03-22
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 12969-12995
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W4360978464
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- pre-service early childhood teachers, digital literacy, teacher self-efficacy, artificial intelligence in education, teacher perceptions, critical thinking, problem-solving skills, teacher education curriculum, early childhood education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
