CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wasting Time? Recycling Incentives in Urban Taiwan and Japan

Kuo, Yen-Lien, Perrings, Charles·2010·Environmental and Resource Economics
DOI 10.1007/s10640-010-9386-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10640-010-9386-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Econ 2: 401–416 · DOI
  2. Dijkgraaf E, Gradus RHJM (2004) Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste—the case of The Netherlands. Resour Energy Econ 26(4): 343–410 · DOI
  3. Fullerton D, Kinnaman TC (1995) Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping. J Environ Econ Manage 29: 78–91 · DOI
  4. Fullerton D, Kinnaman TC (1996) Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag. Am Econ Rev 86(4): 971–984
  5. Hong S, Adams RM (1999) Household responses to price incentives for recycling: some further evidence. Land Econ 75(4): 505–514 · DOI
  6. Hong S, Adams RM, Love HA (1993) An economic analysis of household recycling of solid waste: the case of Portland, Oregon. J Environ Econ Manage 25(2): 136–146 · DOI
  7. Houtven GL, Morris GE (1999) Household behavior under alternative pay-as-you-throw system for solid waste disposal. Land Econ 75(4): 515–537 · DOI
  8. Jenkins RR (1993) The economics of solid waste reduction. Edward Elgar, Hants, England
  9. Jenkins RR, Martinez SA, Palmer K, Podolsky MJ (2003) The determinants of household recycling: a material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. J Environ Econ Manage 45(2): 294–318 · DOI
  10. Kinnaman TC, Fullerton D (2000) Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. J Urban Econ 48: 419–442 · DOI
  11. Kipperberg G (2007) A comparison of household recycling behaviors in Norway and the United States. Environ Resour Econ 36(2): 215–235 · DOI
  12. Kuo Y-L (2005) A dynamic model for four options household waste disposal management. In: The twentieth international conference on solid waste technology and management. Widener University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  13. Linderhof V, Kooreman P, Allers M, Wiersma D (2001) Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the oostzaan case. Resour Energy Econ 23: 359–371 · DOI
  14. Martin M, Williams ID, Clark M (2006) Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 48: 357–395 · DOI
  15. Miranda ML, Aldy JE (1998) Unit pricing of residential municipal solid waste: lessons from nine case study communities. J Environ Manage 52(1): 79–93 · DOI
  16. Miranda ML, Everett JW, Blume D, Roy BA Jr (1994) Market-based incentives and residential municipal solid waste. J Policy Anal Manage 13(4): 681–698 · DOI
  17. Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1): 69–85 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Nestor DV, Podolsky MJ (1998) Assessing incentive-based environmental policies for reducing household waste disposal. Contemp Econ Policy 16(4): 401–411 · DOI
  19. Podolsky MJ, Spiegel M (1998) Municipal waste disposal: unit pricing and recycling opportunities. Public Works Manage Policy 3: 27–39 · DOI
  20. Reschovsky JD, Stone SE (1994) Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: paying for what you throw away. J Policy Anal Manage 13(1): 120–139 · DOI
  21. Salkie FJ, Adamowicz WL, Luckert MK (2001) Household response to the loss of publicly provided waste removal: a Saskatchewan case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 33: 23–36 · DOI
  22. Seguino S, Criner G, Suarez M (1995) Solid waste management options for maine: the economics of pay-by-the-bay systems. Maine Policy Rev 4(2): 49–58
  23. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environment quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46(Special Issue on Environmental Economics): 757–773 · DOI
  24. Shaw D, Tsai Y-M (2002) Assessing alternative policies for reducing household waste in Taiwan. In: The conference of sustainable economy and society in East Asia, Hokkaido: Hokkaido University
  25. Smith VL (1972) Dynamic of waste accumulation: disposal versus recycling. Q J Econ 86(4): 600–616 · DOI
  26. Sterner T, Bartelings H (1999) Household waste management in a Swedish municipality: determinants of waste disposal, recycling and composting. Environ Resour Econ 13: 473–491 · DOI
  27. Strathman JG, Rufolo AM, GCS Mildner (1995) The demand of solid waste disposal. Land Econ 71(1): 57–64 · DOI
  28. Wertz KL (1976) Economic factors influencing households’ production of refuse. J Environ Econ Manage 2: 263–272 · DOI
  29. Wooldridge J (2003) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Thomson, South-Western, London
  30. Yang H-L, Innes R (2007) Economic incentives and residential waste management in Taiwan: an empirical investigation. Environ Resour Econ 37(3): 489–519 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kuo, Y.-L., & Perrings, C.
Venue
Environmental and Resource Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-06-25
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
423-437
ISSN
  • 0924-6460
  • 1573-1502
DOI
10.1007/s10640-010-9386-1
Cited by
37
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review