Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyScience Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revealing educationally critical aspects of rate

Open access
Herbert, Sandra, Pierce, Robyn·2012·Educational Studies in Mathematics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10649-011-9368-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bell, A., & Onslow, B. (1987). Multiplicative structures: Development of the understanding of rates (intensive quantities). In J. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 275–281). Montreal: PME.
  2. Bowden, J. (1994). The nature of phenomenographic research. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenographic research: Variations in method (pp. 43–55). Melbourne: RMIT Publications.
  3. Cope, C. (2000). Educationally critical aspects of the experience of learning about the concept of an information system. Unpublished PhD thesis [On-line]. Accessed 29 January, 2010 from http://www.ironbark.bendigo.latrobe.edu.au/staff/cope/cope-thesis.pdf
  4. Kaput, J., & Schorr, R. (2002). Changing representational infrastructures changes most everything: The case of SimCalc, algebra & calculus. In K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on the impact of technology on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 47–75). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  5. Oliveros, R., & Santos-Trigo, M. (1997). Students' cognitive approaches to the concept of rate. In J. A. Dossey, J. O. Swafford, M. Parmantie, & A. E. Dossey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 31–36). Bloomington-Normal: NA-PME.
  6. Stewart, J. (2007). Essential calculus. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
  7. Tall, D. (1985). Understanding the calculus. Mathematics Teaching, 110, 49–53.

Cited by

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Herbert, S., & Pierce, R.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Herbert, Sandra
Venue
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Published
2011-12-14
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
85-101
ISSN
  • 0013-1954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0816
OpenAlex
W2086040051
Cited by
41
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Educational Studies in Mathematics (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
rate of change, phenomenography, Year 10 students, misconceptions, mathematics education, calculus readiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.