Cited by 59Arsenic contamination and mitigationMine drainage and remediation techniquesHeavy metals in environment

Mobilization of arsenic in groundwater of Bangladesh: evidence from an incubation study

Anawar, H. M., Akai, J., Yoshioka, T., Konohira, E., Lee, J. Y., Fukuhara, H., Tari Kul Alam, M., Garcia-Sanchez, A.·2006·Environmental Geochemistry and Health

Abstract

The extensive extraction of arsenic (As)-contaminated groundwaters for drinking, household and agricultural purposes represents a serious health concern in many districts of Bangladesh. This laboratory-based incubation study investigated the sources and mechanisms of As mobilization in these groundwaters. Several incubation studies were carried out using sediments collected from the Bangladesh aquifer that were supplemented, or not, with different nutrients, followed by an analysis of the sediment suspensions for pH, ORP (oxidation-reduction potential), EC (electrical conductivity) and As and Fe(II) concentrations. In the substrate-amended sediment suspensions incubated under anaerobic environment, there was a mobilization of As (maximum: 50-67 microg/l) and Fe(II) (maximum: 182 microg/l), while the ORP value decreased immediately and drastically (as much as -468 mV to -560 mV) within 5-6 days. In the sediment suspensions incubated under control and aerobic conditions, no significant As mobilization occurred. The simultaneous mobilization of As and Fe(II) from sediments is a strong indication that their mobilization resulted from the reduction of Fe oxyhydroxide by the enhanced activity of indigenous bacteria present in the sediments; this phenomenon also provides insights on the mobilization mechanism of As in groundwater. The concentrations of As in the sediments used in the incubation studies were strongly linked to the gradients of redox potential development that was sti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10653-006-9054-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anawar, H. M., Akai, J., Yoshioka, T., Konohira, E., Lee, J. Y., Fukuhara, H., Tari Kul Alam, M., & Garcia-Sanchez, A.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Niigata University (JP)
  • Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Anawar, H. M.
Venue
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Published
2006-11-21
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
553-565
ISSN
  • 0269-4042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2983
OpenAlex
W2059635133
Cited by
59
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Geochemistry and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
arsenic mobilization, groundwater contamination, iron(II) release, iron oxyhydroxide reduction, microbial reduction, redox potential, sediment incubation, drinking water
MeSH terms
Arsenic, Bangladesh, Ferric Compounds, Fertilizers, Nitrogen Isotopes, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Geologic Sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review