The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of soil contamination–A review
Open accessAbstract
The paper provides a complex, critical assessment of heavy metal soil pollution using different indices. Pollution indices are widely considered a useful tool for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of contamination. Moreover, they can have a great importance in the assessment of soil quality and the prediction of future ecosystem sustainability, especially in the case of farmlands. Eighteen indices previously described by several authors ( I geo , PI, EF , C f , PI sum , PI Nemerow , PLI, PI ave , PI Vector , PIN, MEC, CSI, MERMQ, C deg , RI, mCd and ExF) as well as the newly published Biogeochemical Index (BGI) were compared. The content, as determined by other authors, of the most widely investigated heavy metals (Cd, Pb and Zn) in farmland, forest and urban soils was used as a database for the calculation of all of the presented indices, and this shows, based on statistical methods, the similarities and differences between them. The indices were initially divided into two groups: individual and complex. In order to achieve a more precise classification, our study attempted to further split indices based on their purpose and method of calculation. The strengths and weaknesses of each index were assessed; in addition, a comprehensive method for pollution index choice is presented, in order to best interpret pollution in different soils (farmland, forest and urban). This critical review also contains an evaluation of various geochemical backgrounds (GBs) used in heavy metal soil pollution assessments. The authors propose a comprehensive method in order to assess soil quality, based on the application of local and reference GB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trace Elements in Soils and Plants
Kabata-Pendias, A. (2010) · doi:10.1201/b10158 · Cited by 11,918
Cited by
Li, Z., Liang, Y., Hu, H., Shaheen, S. M., Zhong, H., Tack, F. M. G., Wu, M., Li, Y.-F., Gao, Y., Rinklebe, J., et al. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106749 · Cited by 292
Tume, P., Barrueto, K., Olguin, M., Torres, J., Cifuentes, J., Ferraro, F. X., Roca, N., Bech, J., & Cornejo, O. (2020) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-019-00423-2 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kowalska, J. B., Mazurek, R., Gąsiorek, M., & Zaleski, T.
- Venue
- Environmental Geochemistry and Health
- Published
- 2018-04-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2395-2420
- ISSN
- 0269-4042 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2983
- OpenAlex
- W2796378037
- Cited by
- 979
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of soil contamination–A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10653-018-0106-z
- The paper
- Kowalska, J. B., Mazurek, R., Gąsiorek, M., & Zaleski, T. (2018). Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of soil contamination–A review. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0106-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.