The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions
Stein, T. (2005) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x · Cited by 1,507
B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF P OSTHARVEST D ISEASES OF F RUITS
Janisiewicz, W. J., & Korsten, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120401.130158 · Cited by 1,013
Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin
Peypoux, F., Bonmatin, J. M., & Wallach, J. (1999) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051432 · Cited by 790
Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?
Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 758
Induced resistance in plants and the role of pathogenesis-related proteins
Van Loon, L. C. (1997) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1023/a:1008638109140 · Cited by 689
Principles of Fermentation Technology
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-11099-1 · Cited by 640
Volatile antimicrobials from Muscodor crispans, a novel endophytic fungus
Mitchell, A. M., Strobel, G. A., Moore, E., Robison, R., & Sears, J. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.032540-0 · Cited by 484
Volatile antimicrobials from Muscodor albus, a novel endophytic fungus
Strobel, G. A., Sears, J., Dirkse, E., & Markworth, C. (2001) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-147-11-2943 · Cited by 475
Crowe, J. H., Carpenter, J. F., Crowe, L. M., & Anchordoguy, T. J. (1990) · Cryobiology · doi:10.1016/0011-2240(90)90023-w · Cited by 467
Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: An Emerging Technology*
Wilson, C. L., & Wisniewski, M. E. (1989) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.27.090189.002233 · Cited by 420
Cited by
Review: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit
Liu, J., Sui, Y., Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., & Liu, Y. (2013) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004 · Cited by 521
Exploitation of microbial antagonists for the control of postharvest diseases of fruits: a review
Dukare, A. S., Paul, S., Nambi, V. E., Gupta, R. K., Singh, R., Sharma, K., & Vishwakarma, R. K. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1417235 · Cited by 510
Parafati, L., Vitale, A., Restuccia, C., & Cirvilleri, G. (2015) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.013 · Cited by 391
Biological control of plant diseases – What has been achieved and what is the direction?
Collinge, D. B., Jensen, D. F., Rabiey, M., Sarrocco, S., Shaw, M. W., & Shaw, R. H. (2022) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.13555 · Cited by 319
Morales-Cedeño, L. R., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., Loeza-Lara, P. D., Parra-Cota, F. I., de los Santos-Villalobos, S., & Santoyo, G. (2021) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2020.126612 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Nunes, C. A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Plant Pathology
- Published
- 2011-12-21
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-196
- ISSN
- 0929-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8469
- OpenAlex
- W1978402038
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10658-011-9919-7
- The paper
- Nunes, C. A. (2012). Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. European Journal of Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-011-9919-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
