Cited by 4AI in Service InteractionsDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The effect of chatbots humanness and brand associations on consumer purchase intentions: an experimental approach

Matosas-López, Luis·2026·Electronic Commerce Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10660-025-10064-6

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Matosas-López, L.
Affiliations
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Corresponding author
Matosas-López, Luis
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research
Published
2025-11-07
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
2395-2421
ISSN
  • 1389-5753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9362
OpenAlex
W4415981272
Cited by
4
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Electronic Commerce Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
chatbots, brand associations, purchase intention, conversational intelligence, task complexity, mediating effect, moderating effect, e-commerce, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review