The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arsenic occurrence and accumulation in soil and water of eastern districts of Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Arsenic in the soil and water of eastern districts of Uttar Pradesh (Ballia and Ghazipur) was estimated. Survey results revealed that arsenic in soil samples ranged from 5.40 to 15.43 parts per million (ppm). In water samples, it ranged from 43.75 to 620.75 parts per billion (ppb) which far exceeded the permissible limit of 10 ppb as recommended by the World Health Organization. Maximum concentration of arsenic in water was found in Haldi village of Ballia (620.75 ppb). However, mean arsenic concentration in water followed the order: Karkatpur (257.21 ppb) < Haldi (310.15 ppb) < Sohaon (346.94 ppb) < Dharmarpur (401.75 ppb). In case of soil, maximum arsenic was detected in soil of Sohaon (15.43 ppm). Mean arsenic levels in soils followed the order: Karkatpur (9.24 ppm) < Haldi (9.82 ppm) < Dharmarpur (11.32 ppm) < Sohaon (14.08 ppm). Arsenic levels were higher in soils collected from 15-30 cm depth than 0-15 cm from the soil surface.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Katsoyiannis et al., 2008, [214] demonstrated the application of a treatment method for the removal of iron, ammonium, manganese, and phosphate from groundwater. In this method, the biological oxidation of ammonium and Mn(II) for the simultaneous AsIII oxidation and subsequent AsV removal by coagulation from groundwater was applied.”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [214]
In the citing paper
“This method is a combined groundwater treatment approach, that is, bioremediation coupled with physicochemical treatment with low operational costs [214].”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [214]
In the citing paper
“A water treatment unit based on this technology is operational in northern Greece in the city of Malgara. The same can be effectively applied at grass root level in other arsenic contaminated parts of the world.”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [214]
Citations
Cites
Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals
Nriagu, J. O., & Pacyna, J. M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/333134a0 · Cited by 4,368
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Ahamed, S., Sengupta, M. K., Mukherjee, A., Amir Hossain, M., Das, B., Nayak, B., et al. (2006). Arsenic groundwater contamination and its health effects in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) in upper and middle Ganga plain. India: a severe danger. Science of the Total Environment, 370, 310–332. · DOI
- Bhattacharjee, S., Chakravarty, S., Maity, S., Dureja, V., & Gupta, K. K. (2005). Metal contents in the groundwater of Sahebgunj district, Jharkhand, India, with special reference to arsenic. Chemosphere, 58, 1203–1217. · DOI
- Chakraborti, D., Rahman, M. M., Paul, K., Chowdhury, U. K., Sengupta, M. K., Lodh, D., et al. (2002). Arsenic calamity in the Indian sub-continent—what lessons have been learned? Talanta, 58, 3–22. · DOI
- Chakraborti, D., Mukherjee, S. C., Pati, S., Sengupta, M. K., Rahman, M. M., Chowdhury, U. K., et al. (2003). Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(9), 1194–1201. · DOI
- Christen, K. (2001). Chickens, manure, and arsenic. Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 184–185. · DOI
- Dahal, B. M., Fuerhacker, M., Mentler, A., Shrestha, R. R., & Blum, W. E. H. (2008). Screening of arsenic in irrigation water used for vegetable production in Nepal. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 54, 41–51. · DOI
- Datta, D. V., & Kaul, M. K. (1976). Arsenic content of tubewell water in villages in northern India. A concept of arsenicosis. Journal Association Physics India, 24, 599–604.
- Dwivedi, S., Tripathi, R. D., Srivastava, S., Singh, R., Kumar, A., Tripathi, P., et al. (2010). Arsenic affects mineral nutrients in grains of various Indian rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes grown under arsenic-contaminated soils of West Bengal. Protoplasma. doi: 10.1007/s00709-010-0151-7 . · DOI
- Garai, R., Chakraborti, A. K., Dey, S. B., & Saha, K. C. (1984). Chronic arsenic poisoning from tubewell water. Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 82(1), 34–35.
- Mandal, B. K., & Suzuki, K. T. (2002). Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta, 58, 201–235. · DOI
- Meharg, A. A., & Rahman, M. (2003). Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh paddy field soils: implications for rice contribution to arsenic consumption. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 229–234. · DOI
- O’Neill P (1995) Arsenic. In: Heavy metals in soils. Ed. B J Alloway, pp. 105–121 · DOI
- Pigna, M., Cozzolino, V., Violante, A., & Meharg, A. A. (2009). Influence of phosphate on the arsenic uptake by wheat(Triticum durum L.) irrigated with arsenic solutions at three different concentrations. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 197, 371–380. · DOI
- Requejo, R., & Tena, M. (2006). Maize response to arsenic toxicity as revealed by proteome analysis of plant shoots. Proteomics, 6, 156–162. · DOI
- Roychowdhury, T., Tokunaga, T., Uchino, & Masanori, A. (2005). Effect of arsenic contaminated water on agricultural land soil and plants in West Bengal, India. Chemosphere, 58, 799–810. · DOI
- Shrestha, R. R., Surestha, M. P., Upadhyay, N. P., Pradhan, R., Maskey, A., Maharjan, M., et al. (2003). Groundwater arsenic contamination, its health impact and mitigation program in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, A38(1), 185–200. · DOI
- Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002). A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 517–568. · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, A. H., Goycolea, M., Haque, R., & Biggs, M. L. (1998). Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of Northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147, 660–669. · DOI
- Vaughan, G. T. (1993). The environmental chemistry and fate of arsenical pesticides in cattle tick dip sites and banana land plantations. Melbourne: CSIRO Division of Coal Industry, Center for Advanced Analytical Chemistry.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Srivastava, S., & Sharma, Y. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Lucknow (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Srivastava, Saumya
- Venue
- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
- Published
- 2012-10-05
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4995-5002
- ISSN
- 0167-6369 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2959
- OpenAlex
- W1984960076
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- arsenic contamination, soil arsenic, drinking water arsenic, arsenic accumulation, groundwater quality, soil depth, Ballia district, Ghazipur district, Uttar Pradesh
- MeSH terms
- Arsenic, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollution, Fresh Water, India, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Water Pollutants, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
