Cited by 0Water Quality and Pollution AssessmentWater Quality and Resources StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Temporal dynamics outweigh spatial gradients in shaping water quality across a regulated Afrotropical reservoir cascade

Open access
Ibrahim, Abdullahi, Sadiku, Suleiman Omeiza Eku, Robertson-Andersson, Deborah Vivienne, Okpeku, Moses·2026·Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Water quality in regulated tropical reservoirs is shaped by the interplay of seasonal hydrology, spatial habitat heterogeneity, land use, and climate variability, yet the relative importance of these drivers remains poorly quantified in African river basins. We aimed to partition the variance in water quality among temporal, spatial, land-use, and climate drivers across the Kainji–Jebba reservoir cascade in Nigeria and to identify sentinel parameters capable of consistently and timely detecting water-quality change. Monthly water-quality surveys were conducted at six sites spanning two dams and three habitat types (riverine, ecotonal, and lacustrine) from April 2024 to March 2025 ( n = 72 samples). A modified National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (WQI) was calculated for each sample. Variance partitioning using partial redundancy analysis (RDA), exploratory Granger causality testing, and six complementary changepoint detection methods were applied to disentangle the relative contributions of space, time, land use, and climate. Temporal variation (season and month) explained 28.3% of the variance in water quality, whereas spatial factors accounted for 1.8% and land-use effects for 0.4%. These results suggest that seasonal hydrological dynamics were the dominant structuring force within the study period, although the limited spatial extent of sampling (six sites across two reservoirs) should be considered when interpreting the comparatively weak spatial signal. After Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery-rate correction, no climate–water-quality relationships were statistically significant across 480 stratified Granger causality tests; given the exploratory scope of the analysis and the 1-year dataset, this null result is treated as hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive. WQI, electrical conductivity (EC), and relative humidity (RH) showed the highest changepoint consensus detection rates (71.4% each) and are proposed as sentinel parameters for water-quality monitoring, although the role of RH warrants further investigation before operational adoption. These findings suggest that monitoring programmes in regulated tropical reservoir cascades may benefit from prioritising targeted seasonal windows, the wet-season runoff peak (June–July) and the black flood period (January–February), rather than expanding spatial coverage, pending validation across longer time series. The integrated analytical framework, combining WQI, variance partitioning, exploratory Granger causality, and multi-method changepoint detection, offers a transferable template for other data-poor tropical river systems where monitoring resources must be allocated efficiently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10661-026-15681-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64

Authors
Ibrahim, A., Sadiku, S. O. E., Robertson-Andersson, D. V., & Okpeku, M.
Affiliations
  • Federal University of Technology Minna (NG)
  • Chrysalis (US)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Ibrahim, Abdullahi
  • Sadiku, Suleiman Omeiza Eku
  • Robertson-Andersson, Deborah Vivienne
  • Okpeku, Moses
Venue
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Published
2026-08-03
Volume
198
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0167-6369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2959
OpenAlex
W7172269729
Cited by
0
References
64
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
reservoir water quality, seasonal hydrology, temporal dynamics, spatial gradients, land use, climate variability, water quality index, change point detection, Granger causality, electrical conductivity, relative humidity, water quality monitoring
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Nigeria, Seasons, Water Supply, Ecosystem, Rivers, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review