The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“A triangulation approach (Jick, 1979) will allow for a more accurate picture of the studied phenomena.”
MethodConstructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires – Theory and practice in social research
Foddy, W., & Mantle, J. (1994) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(10)61110-8 · Cited by 726
De Vaus, D., & de Vaus, D. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203519196 · Cited by 491
People, organizations, and process improvement
Perry, D. E., Staudenmayer, N. A., & Votta, L. G. (1994) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.300082 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · Cited by 3,862
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review
Bacchelli, A., & Bird, C. (2013) · 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse.2013.6606617 · Cited by 650
(2013) · doi:10.5555/2486788.2486882 · Cited by 437
Ampatzoglou, A., Bibi, S., Avgeriou, P., Verbeek, M., & Chatzigeorgiou, A. (2019) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.10.006 · Cited by 305
The ABC of Software Engineering Research
Stol, K.-J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3241743 · Cited by 245
Resumption strategies for interrupted programming tasks
Parnin, C., & Rugaber, S. (2011) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-010-9104-9 · Cited by 103
Application Programming Interface Documentation: What Do Software Developers Want?
Meng, M., Steinhardt, S., & Schubert, A. (2018) · Journal of Technical Writing and Communication · doi:10.1177/0047281617721853 · Cited by 78
Marshall, C., Brereton, P., & Kitchenham, B. (2015) · Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2745802.2745827 · Cited by 46
Identification of SLR tool needs – results of a community workshop
Hassler, E., Carver, J. C., Hale, D., & Al-Zubidy, A. (2016) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.10.011 · Cited by 35
Resumption strategies for interrupted programming tasks
Parnin, C., & Rugaber, S. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 17th International Conference on Program Comprehension · doi:10.1109/icpc.2009.5090030 · Cited by 24
Muszynski, M., Lugtigheid, S., Castor, F., & Brinkkemper, S. (2022) · 2022 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) · doi:10.1109/icsa53651.2022.00013 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Lethbridge, T. C., Sim, S. E., & Singer, J.
- Venue
- Empirical Software Engineering
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-341
- ISSN
- 1382-3256 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7616
- OpenAlex
- W2034628356
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 37.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.