The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Cloning considered harmful” considered harmful: patterns of cloning in software
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tracking Code Clones in Evolving Software
Duala-Ekoko, E., & Robillard, M. P. (2007) · 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07) · doi:10.1109/icse.2007.90 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Quantifying the Effect of Code Smells on Maintenance Effort
Sjoberg, D. I. K., Yamashita, A., Anda, B. C. D., Mockus, A., & Dyba, T. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.89 · Cited by 316
The adverse effects of code duplication in machine learning models of code
Allamanis, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software · doi:10.1145/3359591.3359735 · Cited by 284
(2014) · doi:10.1145/2635868.2635901 · Cited by 159
Rahman, F., Bird, C., & Devanbu, P. (2012) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-011-9195-3 · Cited by 132
A comparison of code similarity analysers
Ragkhitwetsagul, C., Krinke, J., & Clark, D. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9564-7 · Cited by 122
MARBLE: Mining for Boilerplate Code to Identify API Usability Problems
Nam, D., Horvath, A., Macvean, A., Myers, B., & Vasilescu, B. (2019) · 2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase.2019.00063 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapser, C. J., & Godfrey, M. W.
- Venue
- Empirical Software Engineering
- Published
- 2008-07-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 645-692
- ISSN
- 1382-3256 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7616
- OpenAlex
- W2090432523
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 52.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
